John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wrote. 'All Financial Crises are the result of Debt that, in one fashion or another, has become Dangero

CS Professional · Banking - Law and Practice · PYQS · June 2021
John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wrote. 'All Financial Crises are the result of Debt that, in one fashion or another, has become Dangerously out of Scale'. This was clearly demonstrated in the Financial Crisis which took place in the US in 2008. Aggressive lending characterized by Sub-prime Housing Loans and excessive leverage in major Banks and Financial Institutions led to the most serious financial challenge since the Great Depression of 1930s. The Sub Prime Crisis had reportedly led to a total write off of 1.18 trillion Dollars. One has to understand the causes of the Financial Crisis and take appropriate measures to avoid its recurrence. In order to withstand such a shock in future, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has announced on 13th September, 2010, New Capital Rules as agreed by the global regulators. The new requirement, known as Basel-III, demands a substantial strengthening of existing capital requirements. This involves higher global Minimum Capital Standards for Banks. As cited above, Basel-III reforms are the response of BCBS to improve the Banking Sector's ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress, whatever the source, thus reducing the Risk of Spill over from the financial sector to the real economy. During the Pittsburgh Summit in September 2009, the G-20 leaders committed to strengthen the regulatory system for Banks and other Financial Firms and also act together to raise Capital Standards, to implement strong International Compensation Standards aimed at ending practices that lead to excessive risk-taking, to improve the Over-The-Counter Derivatives Market and to create more powerful tools to hold large global firms to account for the risks they take. For all these reforms, the leaders set for themselves strict and precise timetables. Consequently, the BCBS released comprehensive reform package entitled "Basel-III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient Banks and Banking Systems" (known as Basel III capital regulations) in December 2010. Basel-III reforms strengthen the Bank-level i.e. Micro prudential regulation, with the intention to raise the resilience of individual Banking Institutions in periods of stress. Besides, the reforms have a Macro prudential focus also, addressing system wide risks, which can build up across, the Banking Sector, as well as the pro-cyclical amplification of these risks over time. These new Global Regulatory and Supervisory Standards mainly seek to raise the Quality and level of Capital to ensure Banks are better able to absorb losses on both a going concern and a gone concern basis, increase the Risk coverage of the Capital framework, introduce Leverage Ratio to serve as a backdrop to the Risk-based Capital measure, raise the Standards for the Supervisory Review Process (Pillar-2) and Public Disclosures (Pillar-3) etc. The Macro prudential aspects of Basel-III are largely enshrined in the Capital Buffers. Both the Buffers i.e. the Capital Conservation Buffer and the Countercyclical Buffer are intended to protect the Banking Sector from periods of excess Credit Growth. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued Guidelines based on the Basel-III reforms on Capital Regulation on 2nd May, 2012, to the extent applicable to Banks Operating in India. Banks have started implementing the Guidelines from 1st April, 2013 in India in a phased manner. Banks are advised by RBI to report the CRAR as per Basel-II and Basel-III simultaneously in all their disclosures to the stakeholders. In this backdrop, you are required to give answers in the context of prevailing Banking Practices and various RBI Compliances to the following: What sort of Capacity Building is required in the Implementation of Basel-III, especially in the area of Risk Management?

Answer & Explanation:

There are no two views about the need for building capacity within the banks, and also in the Reserve Bank which is the regulator, to efficiently implement Basel-III. By far the most important reform is that there should be a radical change in Banks' Approach to Risk Management. Banks in India are currently operating on the standardized approaches of Basel-II. The Larger Banks need to migrate to the Advanced Approaches, especially as they expand their overseas presence. The adoption of Advanced Approaches to Risk Management will enable Banks to manage their capital more efficiently and improve their Profitability. This graduation to Advanced Approaches requires three things which are as under: First and most importantly, a change in perception from looking upon the capital framework as a compliance function to seeing it as a necessary pre-requisite for keeping the Bank sound, stable, and therefore profitable; Second, deeper and more broad based capacity in risk management; and Third, Adequate and good quality data.

Topics: Risk Management in Banks

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic