John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wrote. 'All Financial Crises are the result of Debt that, in one fashion or another, has become Dangero
CS Professional · Banking - Law and Practice · PYQS · June 2021
John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wrote. 'All Financial Crises are the result of Debt that, in one fashion or another, has become Dangerously out of Scale'. This was clearly demonstrated in the Financial Crisis which took place in the US in 2008. Aggressive lending characterized by Sub-prime Housing Loans and excessive leverage in major Banks and Financial Institutions led to the most serious financial challenge since the Great Depression of 1930s. The Sub Prime Crisis had reportedly led to a total write off of 1.18 trillion Dollars. One has to understand the causes of the Financial Crisis and take appropriate measures to avoid its recurrence. In order to withstand such a shock in future, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has announced on 13th September, 2010, New Capital Rules as agreed by the global regulators. The new requirement, known as Basel-III, demands a substantial strengthening of existing capital requirements. This involves higher global Minimum Capital Standards for Banks. As cited above, Basel-III reforms are the response of BCBS to improve the Banking Sector's ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress, whatever the source, thus reducing the Risk of Spill over from the financial sector to the real economy. During the Pittsburgh Summit in September 2009, the G-20 leaders committed to strengthen the regulatory system for Banks and other Financial Firms and also act together to raise Capital Standards, to implement strong International Compensation Standards aimed at ending practices that lead to excessive risk-taking, to improve the Over-The-Counter Derivatives Market and to create more powerful tools to hold large global firms to account for the risks they take. For all these reforms, the leaders set for themselves strict and precise timetables. Consequently, the BCBS released comprehensive reform package entitled "Basel-III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient Banks and Banking Systems" (known as Basel III capital regulations) in December 2010. Basel-III reforms strengthen the Bank-level i.e. Micro prudential regulation, with the intention to raise the resilience of individual Banking Institutions in periods of stress. Besides, the reforms have a Macro prudential focus also, addressing system wide risks, which can build up across, the Banking Sector, as well as the pro-cyclical amplification of these risks over time. These new Global Regulatory and Supervisory Standards mainly seek to raise the Quality and level of Capital to ensure Banks are better able to absorb losses on both a going concern and a gone concern basis, increase the Risk coverage of the Capital framework, introduce Leverage Ratio to serve as a backdrop to the Risk-based Capital measure, raise the Standards for the Supervisory Review Process (Pillar-2) and Public Disclosures (Pillar-3) etc. The Macro prudential aspects of Basel-III are largely enshrined in the Capital Buffers. Both the Buffers i.e. the Capital Conservation Buffer and the Countercyclical Buffer are intended to protect the Banking Sector from periods of excess Credit Growth. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued Guidelines based on the Basel-III reforms on Capital Regulation on 2nd May, 2012, to the extent applicable to Banks Operating in India. Banks have started implementing the Guidelines from 1st April, 2013 in India in a phased manner. Banks are advised by RBI to report the CRAR as per Basel-II and Basel-III simultaneously in all their disclosures to the stakeholders. In this backdrop, you are required to give answers in the context of prevailing Banking Practices and various RBI Compliances to the following: What is the Additional Capital that Indian Banks have to mobilize to conform to Basel-III?
Answer & Explanation:
Indian banks already meet the minimum capital requirements of Basel-III at an aggregate level, even though some individual banks may have to top up. The size of the additional capital required to be raised by Indian banks depends on the assumption made, and there are various estimates floating around. Whether the Market will be able to provide equity capital of this size. The amount the market will have to provide will depend on how much of the recapitalization burden of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) the Government will meet. The extended period of full Basel-III implementation spread over five years gives sufficient time to Banks to plan the time-table of their capital rising over this period. Clearly, providing equity capital of this size in the face of fiscal constraints poses significant challenges. A tempting option for the Government would be to issue recapitalization bonds against Common Equity Infusion. But this will militate against fiscal transparency. In the alternative, would the Government be open to reducing its shareholding in PSBs to below 51 per cent. If the Government decides to pursue this option, an additional consideration is whether it will amend the statute to protect its majority voting rights.
Topics: Risk Management in Banks
Related Questions in this Topic
- John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wro...
- John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wro...
- John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wro...
- John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wro...
- John Kenneth Galbraith, famous Harvard Economist and the US Ambassador to India during J.F. Kennedy's Administration wro...