"In comparison to demerger, slump sale is not generally tax efficient." Comment briefly with any case that had taken place.
CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · PYQS · December 2019
"In comparison to demerger, slump sale is not generally tax efficient." Comment briefly with any case that had taken place.
Answer & Explanation:
The statement is true since any undertaking being transferred, if held for more than 3 years prior to the date of the slump sale, the gains from such a sale would qualify as long-term capital gains, and the effective rate of tax would be 20%. If the undertaking had been held for 3 years or any period lesser than that, prior to the date of slump sale, then the income would be taxable as short-term capital gains, the effective rate of which is currently 30%. Also, any distribution by the company to its shareholders could attract dividend distribution tax. This did not however, prevent the acquisition of Formulation Business from Piramal Health Care Ltd. by Abbott Healthcare Private Limited in 2010.
Topics: Corporate Restructuring
Related Questions in this Topic
- Is it possible to restructure debts through reduction of capital? Support your answer with a decided case law.
- Indicate briefly the tax concessions available to a demerged company in terms of Income Tax, 1961.
- "While according approval to the scheme of amalgamation of two banking companies, Board of Directors need to give carefu...
- "Corporate restructuring strategies depend on the nature of business, type of diversification required with the object o...
- The approval of Tribunal is required for any scheme of reconstruction. The Tribunal considers minority interest while ap...