An importer, imports some luxury items and deposited the same in a warehouse on 1st September, 2019, due to lack of demand, he applies for extension of warehousing period and department granted the extension till 31 Dece
CS Professional · Advanced Tax Laws and Practice · PYQS · December 2021
An importer, imports some luxury items and deposited the same in a warehouse on 1st September, 2019, due to lack of demand, he applies for extension of warehousing period and department granted the extension till 31 December, 2020. The importer did not remove the goods even after the extended date. In the meantime the goods were destroyed in the warehouse. Then the importer applied for remission under section 23 of the Custom Act, 1962. Department rejected his claim stating that remission cannot be granted on goods stored in the warehouse. Discuss whether the refusal of claim by department is valid or not with reference to the Customs law and decided case law.
Answer & Explanation:
As per section 61 of the Customs Act, 1962, the imported goods can be deposited in a warehouse for a maximum period of one year subject to extension in some cases. Thus, removal of goods should be planned properly and the goods shall be moved within the prescribed period, else there will be necessary penalties resulting in sheer loss of money. Every effort must be made to see that the goods are cleared from the warehouse in time before the goods get destroyed or damaged beyond repair. No remission is granted on such goods deposited in a warehouse where the importer failed to clear within the stipulated time. In the case of 'Decorative laminates (1) Pvt. Ltd 2010 (HC)', The High Court held that no remission under Section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962 can be allowed for warehoused goods if they are lost or destroyed in the warehouse after the expiry of warehousing period. The High Court further held that where the goods are not cleared within the permissible warehousing period, such goods are deemed to be improperly removed in terms of section 72(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. Hence in the present case, action taken by the department is correct and in line with the Customs Law.
Topics: Customs Law
Related Questions in this Topic
- MT Ltd. imported an automated machine by ship, from USA in January, 2021. The details in this regards are as under: (i) ...
- Briefly explain the power to search suspected persons in certain other cases under section 101 Customs Act, 1962.
- Jitender, an Indian resident, aged 45 years, returned to India on 18th Dec., 2020 after visiting Australia for 7 days. H...
- Lalit Export House exported some goods to Germany. The invoice value of the goods exported of ₹45,00,000 was assessed by...
- Determine the assessable value for computation of Customs Duty from the following information relating to a machine impo...