RR Limited has decided to make investment in other companies for ₹50 lakhs, which is in excess of 60% of the company's paid-up share capital, free reserves and securities premium account. Company has 5 directors. Four di
CS Executive · Company Law · PYQS · June 2017
RR Limited has decided to make investment in other companies for ₹50 lakhs, which is in excess of 60% of the company's paid-up share capital, free reserves and securities premium account. Company has 5 directors. Four directors were present in the Board meeting, three directors have given their consent but one director abstained from voting. The decision of the Board was noted in the minutes of Board meeting and decided to make such investment by passing of Board resolution with majority. Referring to the provisions of Companies Act, 2013, examine the validity of the Board's decision.
Answer & Explanation:
In accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, as contained in section 186(5), no investment shall be made or loan or guarantee or security given by the company unless the resolution sanctioning it is passed at a meeting of the Board with the consent of all the directors present at the meeting and the prior approval of the public financial institution concerned where any term loan is subsisting, is obtained. Further, under the provisions of section 186(2) and 186(3), the loan amount must not exceed 60% of its paid-up capital, free reserves and securities premium account or 100% of free reserves and securities premium account, whichever is more. In case, the company wishes to exceed the said limit, prior approval of company through special resolution would be acquired. In the given case, in absence of adequate information, even if we assume that ₹50 lakh does not exceed the 100% of free reserves and securities premium account, RR limited has not complied with the provisions of section 186(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 where consent of all the directors present is required. The resolution of the Board of Directors therefore, is not valid and has no legal effect.
Topics: Company Law
Related Questions in this Topic
- Suresh, the statutory auditor of A Ltd., during the course of the audit detected a fraud against the company by an emplo...
- Examine the validity of Tribunal's order to wind up the company in the following circumstances: Petition is presented by...
- Examine the validity of Tribunal's order to wind up the company in the following circumstances: The registrar has presen...
- A compromise is proposed between Jay Chemicals Ltd. and its creditors. The Tribunal on an application from the creditors...
- The name of Orient Builders Private Ltd. was struck off by the Registrar of Companies on the application of the company ...