A group of Indian citizens hold 60% of the paid up share capital of a foreign company. This group of shareholders claim that since the company was incorporated outside the country, the company is not bound to comply with
CS Executive · Company Law · PYQS · December 2017
A group of Indian citizens hold 60% of the paid up share capital of a foreign company. This group of shareholders claim that since the company was incorporated outside the country, the company is not bound to comply with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in relation to its business in India. Examine the validity of such a claim by the group.
Answer & Explanation:
Section 379 provides that where not less than 50% of the paid-up share capital, whether equity or preference or partly equity and partly preference of a foreign company is held by one or more citizens of India or by one or more bodies corporate incorporated in India, whether singly or in the aggregate, such company shall comply with such of the provisions of this Act, as may be prescribed by the Central Government with regard to the business carried on by it in India, as if it were a company incorporated in India. Therefore, the company is bound to comply with the provisions of Companies Act, 2013. As such the shareholders' claim is not valid in the given case.
Topics: Foreign Companies
Related Questions in this Topic
- To consider a body corporate as a foreign company, a place of business in India is to be established. State the activiti...
- Suresh, the statutory auditor of A Ltd., during the course of the audit detected a fraud against the company by an emplo...
- Examine the validity of Tribunal's order to wind up the company in the following circumstances: Petition is presented by...
- Examine the validity of Tribunal's order to wind up the company in the following circumstances: The registrar has presen...
- A compromise is proposed between Jay Chemicals Ltd. and its creditors. The Tribunal on an application from the creditors...