A was appointed as the Managing Director of OPQ Ltd. for a period of 4 years on his 66th birthday on 1st June, 2016. A Board Resolution was passed to extend his term of office by another five years and the same was appro
CS Executive · Company Law · PYQS · June 2019
A was appointed as the Managing Director of OPQ Ltd. for a period of 4 years on his 66th birthday on 1st June, 2016. A Board Resolution was passed to extend his term of office by another five years and the same was approved by the members in the AGM of the company held on 21st May, 2019, by an ordinary resolution. Is the re-appointment of A as M.D. valid ?
Answer & Explanation:
According to Section 196(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a re-appointment of any person as managing director, whole-time director or manager cannot be made earlier than one year before the expiry of his term as managing director. According to Section 196(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, the managing director can be continued in employment after he has attained the age of 70 years only by passing a special resolution in which case the explanatory statement annexed to the notice for such motion shall indicate the justification for such re-appointment. In the instant case, the term of office of managing director comes to an end on 31st May, 2020. The re-appointment of managing director is sought to be made on 21st May, 2019 i.e. more than one year before the expiry of his term of office. Therefore, the re-appointment of managing director is not in order as the same is not in line with Section 196(1). Further, as the managing director completes 70 years on 31st May, 2020, his re-appointment requires special resolution. In the instant case, his re-appointment has been made by passing an ordinary resolution and not by special resolution as mandated by Section 196 (3) which is also not in order.
Topics: Managerial Remuneration
Related Questions in this Topic
- Under what circumstances can a public company pay total managerial remuneration to its directors including managing dire...
- Suresh, the statutory auditor of A Ltd., during the course of the audit detected a fraud against the company by an emplo...
- Examine the validity of Tribunal's order to wind up the company in the following circumstances: Petition is presented by...
- Examine the validity of Tribunal's order to wind up the company in the following circumstances: The registrar has presen...
- A compromise is proposed between Jay Chemicals Ltd. and its creditors. The Tribunal on an application from the creditors...