A Listed Company was awarded three contracts of drilling rigs. The value of contracts are substantial to the revenue of the Company. As per the normal procedure for bidding there was a time gap between the dates of decla
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2020
A Listed Company was awarded three contracts of drilling rigs. The value of contracts are substantial to the revenue of the Company. As per the normal procedure for bidding there was a time gap between the dates of declaration of the announcement as top bidder and the announcement of the award. This information is considered as 'Price Sensitive' until the stock exchanges were informed, but the company thought that it will inform only after declaration of official award of the contract. However, the officials of the Company were "RESTRICTED" from dealing in the shares of the company immediately after the announcement as top bidder. In the meantime, the Managing Director of the company before submission of this information to the stock exchanges put this information on Facebook timeline and his friends on facebook made likes and some even bought shares. As a Company Secretary elaborate based on a decided case, whether the posting of this on the Facebook timeline. (i) Made the other friends a 'connected person'. (ii) Whether this meant an access to 'Unpublished Price Sensitive Information'.
Answer & Explanation:
The Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) by its order in the matter of Deep Industries Limited (DIL) has held that Sujay is an insider by way of his association with any officer of the company (in the given case the Managing Director) by way of frequent communication with him in their social capacity as evident in this case by frequent interactions including likes on the social media. Further in the said case it was also held that by virtue of this association and frequent communication, Sujay was reasonably expected to have access to the UPSI of DIL at the relevant period. Therefore, as per Regulation 2(1)(d)(i) of the Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations, 2015, Sujay is a connected person and consequently is an Insider with respect to DIL. (i) Yes, in view of the case law discussed above and Regulation 2(1)(d)(i) of the Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations, 2015, the posting of the information on Facebook by the Managing Director, does made other Facebook friends a 'connected person' on the basis of Social Association. (ii) Yes, in view of the above discussion, this meant the connected person are reasonably expected to have, directly or indirectly, an access to 'Unpublished Price Sensitive Information' by virtue of their association and frequent communication as evident in this case by likes on the social media, unpublished price sensitive information.
Topics: Securities Law
Related Questions in this Topic
- An application for settlement proceedings from Mr. Vikas, a registered broker, has been pending with SEBI for a long tim...
- "No person shall indulge in manipulative, fraudulent or an unfair trade practice in securities markets. Dealing in secur...
- Adventure Voyage Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of providing travel related services to its customers. It has...
- Renkel RTA Services Ltd. is the Registrar to the Issue and Transfer Agent ('RTA') of Alphanso Ltd. Avan, an investor dis...
- 'Though the term 'settlement' is widely used in stock exchanges and securities market, Securities and Exchange Board of ...