An application for settlement proceedings from Mr. Vikas, a registered broker, has been pending with SEBI for a long time. SEBI is of the opinion that alleged default for which settlement proceedings are initiated affect
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2024
An application for settlement proceedings from Mr. Vikas, a registered broker, has been pending with SEBI for a long time. SEBI is of the opinion that alleged default for which settlement proceedings are initiated affected the integrity of the market and hence thinking to reject the same. As a procedure, SEBI asked Vikas to appear before the internal committee of the Board to deal with the entire proceeding related matters/issues. Vikas failed to appear before the committee on the scheduled date. The internal committee of the Board gave him another opportunity to appear before them on another date so that his version can also be heard and recorded before any decision is taken. Unfortunately, Vikas failed again to appear before them without assigning any reason or giving any notice to the Board. Considering non-appearance before the internal committee for the second time, Board rejected his application for the settlement proceeding. Analyze and decide whether SEBI can reject application for the settlement proceeding from Vikas based on this ground?
Answer & Explanation:
As per Regulation 5(2) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018 the Board may not settle any specified proceedings, if it is of the opinion that the alleged default: has market wide impact, or caused losses to a large number of investors, or affected the integrity of the market. Further, as per regulation 6(1) of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018, an application may also at any time be rejected on the following grounds: Where the applicant refuses to receive or respond to the communications sent by the Board; Where the applicant does not submit or delays the submission of information, document, Revised Settlement Terms, etc., as called for by the Board; Where the applicant who is required to appear, does not appear before the Internal Committee on more than one occasion; Where the applicant violates in any manner the undertaking and waivers as provided in Part-C of the Schedule-l; Where the applicant does not remit the settlement amount within the period specified in clause (a) of sub-regulation (2) of regulation 15 and/or does not abide by the undertaking and waivers; Where the applicant fails to comply with the condition precedent(s) for settlement within the time as required by the Internal Committee. In the given situation, Board/SEBI rejected Vikas's application for settlement proceedings after his non-appearance before the internal committee of the SEBI/Board for the second time. As per regulations mentioned above, considering that SEBI/Board was of the opinion that the alleged default affected the integrity of the market and also the fact that the applicant who is required to appear, did not appeared before the Internal Committee on more than one occasion, thereby meeting both the criteria under Regulations 5(2)(iii) and 6(1)(c) under which, an application may be rejected. Hence, it may be said that Board/SEBI can reject the application.
Topics: Securities Law
Related Questions in this Topic
- "No person shall indulge in manipulative, fraudulent or an unfair trade practice in securities markets. Dealing in secur...
- Adventure Voyage Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of providing travel related services to its customers. It has...
- Renkel RTA Services Ltd. is the Registrar to the Issue and Transfer Agent ('RTA') of Alphanso Ltd. Avan, an investor dis...
- 'Though the term 'settlement' is widely used in stock exchanges and securities market, Securities and Exchange Board of ...
- Write short notes on: 'Consent Order' issued by SEBI.