Apramey is a qualified Company Secretary and is employed in SEBI as rank of a Division Chief. While conducting an enquiry, he noticed that IIL Ltd, a stock broking firm had failed to issue contract notes in the form and
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · June 2024
Apramey is a qualified Company Secretary and is employed in SEBI as rank of a Division Chief. While conducting an enquiry, he noticed that IIL Ltd, a stock broking firm had failed to issue contract notes in the form and manner specified by the stock exchanges of which it is a member and also charges an amount of brokerage which is in excess of the brokerage specified in the regulations. SEBI asked Apramey to issue notice to IIL Ltd. for penalties. Briefly explain the penalty which can be levied on IIL Ltd. and the factors to be considered while adjudging quantum of penalty.
Answer & Explanation:
According to section 15F of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, if any person, who is registered as a stock broker under this Act: (a) fails to issue contract notes in the form and manner specified by the stock exchange of which such broker is a member, he shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to one crore rupees for which the contract note was required to be issued by that broker; (b) fails to deliver any security or fails to make payment of the amount due to the investor in the manner within the period specified in the regulations, he shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum of one crore rupees; (c) charges an amount of brokerage which is in excess of the brokerage specified in the regulations, he shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to five times the amount of brokerage charged in excess of the specified brokerage, whichever is higher. According to section 15J, while adjudging quantum of penalty under 15-I or section 11 or section 11B, the Board (SEBI) or the adjudicating officer shall have due regard to the following factors, namely: (a) the amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, wherever quantifiable, made as a result of the default; (b) the amount of loss caused to an investor or group of investors as a result of the default; (c) the repetitive nature of the default.
Topics: SEBI Act, 1992
Related Questions in this Topic
- Amit Sinha, commonly known as Sethji, has been accused of certain offenses under the SEBI Act, 1992. SEBI directed him t...
- Meroz is accused for certain violations under SEBI Act, 1992. While prosecution is in progress, SEBI observed that she h...
- SEBI investigated the activities of Kamalai, an individual stock trader. During the investigation, it was found that Kam...
- Amit is accused for certain offences under SEBI Act, 1992. Accordingly, SEBI ordered him to follow certain direction for...
- Differentiate between Punishment for False Statement and Punishment for False Evidence under the Companies Act, 2013.