M/s SHIKSHA Pvt. Ltd (Operational Creditor) provided digital classroom services to M/s ABC Pvt Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) between 16th April 2015 and 23rd June, 2020 and accordingly the Operation Creditor raised 219 invoice
CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · PYQS · June 2024
M/s SHIKSHA Pvt. Ltd (Operational Creditor) provided digital classroom services to M/s ABC Pvt Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) between 16th April 2015 and 23rd June, 2020 and accordingly the Operation Creditor raised 219 invoices. In light of the non-payment by Corporate Debtor, the Operation Creditor issued Demand Notice under Section 8 of the IBC, 2016 wherein date of default was mentioned as 16th April 2015 (the date of first invoice) and subsequently initiated proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016 wherein the date of default was mentioned as 23rd June, 2020 (the date of last invoice). As a company secretary of M/s SHIKSHA Pvt. Ltd. (Operational Creditor) advise whether ground of claim is time barred or not citing relevant case laws.
Answer & Explanation:
Supreme Court (SC) division bench in the case of M/s. Next Education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. K12 Techno Services Pvt. Ltd has settled the law regarding the determination of the limitation period where the Application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) has been filed on the basis of several invoices. Supreme Court (SC) division bench held that when a petition is filed under Section 9 of the I&B Code based on several invoices wherein some of the invoices are time-barred, the Adjudicating Authority must consider invoices raised at least three years preceding the date of filing of Section 9 petition to determine limitation. The Supreme Court set aside the orders of the NCLT and NCLAT and while considering the starting point of limitation as 12 th March 2011 categorically stated that the NCLT should have taken into consideration the subsequent invoices raised up till at least three years preceding the date of the Company Petition rather than considering the starting point of limitation as 12 th March 2011. Earlier, NCLT had dismissed the Company Petition on the ground of the claim being time barred. The NCLAT after lengthy consideration decided that as the section 9 petition emanates from the Demand Notice issued under section 8, considered the date of default shall in the matter be 12 th March 2011 which is time barred as the limitation period expired on 12 th March 2014. The said NCLAT order was challenged by way of the present appeal in Supreme Court. In the given case last date of invoice i.e., 23 rd June, 2020 will be considered at least three years preceding date of filing up petition in NCLT for ascertaining limitation period for filing petition.
Topics: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
Related Questions in this Topic
- Section 208 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 says that where any insolvency resolution, fresh start, liqui...
- Who is contributory ? Critically examine IBC provisions regarding Liquidator's authority to realise amount due from cont...
- Operational Creditors of Joy Ltd moved a petition to NCLT against RP for directions under section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016...
- Abid Industries Ltd filed petition for insolvency in NCLT, Delhi which admitted petition and subsequently resolution pla...
- Examine whether the recommendations of the Insolvency Law Committee (ILS) on Cross-border insolvency are in line with th...