Abid Industries Ltd filed petition for insolvency in NCLT, Delhi which admitted petition and subsequently resolution plan was submitted by RP to committee of creditors which was approved by 87% majority. Resolution plan
CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Valuation and Insolvency · PYQS · June 2024
Abid Industries Ltd filed petition for insolvency in NCLT, Delhi which admitted petition and subsequently resolution plan was submitted by RP to committee of creditors which was approved by 87% majority. Resolution plan provided for extinguishment of all claims (except criminal proceedings) against the Corporate Debtor, exemption of all taxes/dues by the Government/local authorities, and closure of all proceedings pending against the Corporate Debtor relating to such dues. The Resolution Plan, so approved, has been submitted to NCLT for approval. Referring to relevant section and case law, discuss the tenability of Resolution Plan duly approved by 87% majority.
Answer & Explanation:
In the matter of Small Industries Development Bank of India vs. Tirupati Jute Industries Limited [CP (IB) 508/KB/18 and connected matters], the Adjudicating Authority(AA) noted that the resolution plan, which has been submitted for its approval, was subject to extinguishment of all claims (except criminal proceedings) against the Corporate Debtor, exemption of all taxes/dues by the Government/ local authorities, and closure of all proceedings pending against the Corporate Debtor relating to such dues. The Adjudicating Authority rejected the plan and ordered for liquidation. It observed that such a plan should not have been approved by the CoC, as it was not consistent with the provisions of section 30(2)(e) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code. The resolution professional shall examine each resolution plan received by him to confirm that each resolution plan does not contravene any of the provisions of the law for the time being in force. AA also observed that the Resolution Professional did not give correct advice when he submitted the plan for approval of CoC and therefore, it would not be proper to appoint him as the Liquidator. Thus, resolution plan approved by COC and submitted to AA is not fair/just hence its tenability / justifiability is questionable and liable to be rejected.
Topics: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)
Related Questions in this Topic
- Section 208 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 says that where any insolvency resolution, fresh start, liqui...
- Who is contributory ? Critically examine IBC provisions regarding Liquidator's authority to realise amount due from cont...
- Operational Creditors of Joy Ltd moved a petition to NCLT against RP for directions under section 60(5) of the IBC, 2016...
- Examine whether the recommendations of the Insolvency Law Committee (ILS) on Cross-border insolvency are in line with th...
- In the third meeting of Committee of Creditors of ABC Company Ltd, the Interim Resolution Professional was replaced by a...