Indus Biotech Private Limited issued Optionally Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares (OCRPS) to Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund through share subscription and shareholders agreements. When Indus opted for a Quali
CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation · PYQS · December 2025
Indus Biotech Private Limited issued Optionally Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares (OCRPS) to Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund through share subscription and shareholders agreements. When Indus opted for a Qualified Initial Public Offering (QIPO), Kotak chose to convert its preference shares into equity shares in accordance with regulation 5(2) of SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018. However, a dispute emerged over the calculation and conversion formula for this transformation. Kotak claimed a 30% stake in the paid-up share capital of the equity shares upon conversion, while Indus argued for only a 10% stake. The central issue in this dispute revolved around whether Kotak's exercise of redemption options constituted a 'default' under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), allowing them to initiate insolvency proceedings against Indus using a Section 7 petition as a financial creditor. Indus contended that discussions regarding the conversion of shares, rather than redemption, had taken place, and until a resolution was reached on the disagreement about the percentage of equity shares to be allocated, there was no obligation to repay, thus implying no 'debt' or 'default' under the IBC. In response to Kotak's Section 7 petition, Indus filed an Arbitration Application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the aim of resolving the dispute through arbitration. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) granted this Arbitration Application, directing the parties to engage in arbitration and subsequently dismissing the Section 7 petition. Kotak, dissatisfied with the NCLT's ruling, sought redress from the Supreme Court. Whether it is permissible to file an application for arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act after an insolvency resolution petition under Section 7 of the IBC has been admitted ?
Answer & Explanation:
The issue is whether an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can be entertained after an insolvency resolution petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has been admitted. As per the scheme of the IBC, insolvency proceedings are intended to be time-bound and are initiated for the purpose of determining the existence of a financial debt and default. The IBC does not contain any provision mandating reference of disputes to arbitration, nor does it subordinate insolvency proceedings to arbitral processes. On the contrary, Section 238 of the IBC gives it an overriding effect over other laws. In Indus Biotech Private Limited v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund (Supreme Court, 26.03.2021) , the Supreme Court clarified the legal position regarding the interface between arbitration and insolvency proceedings. The operative holding of the Court is that: An application under Section 7 of the IBC must first be examined by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to determine whether a financial debt and default exist. Till the Section 7 petition is admitted, the insolvency proceedings do not attain the character of proceedings in rem. If the NCLT comes to the conclusion that no default is made out, the Section 7 application is liable to be dismissed, and in such a situation, the dispute may be referred to arbitration, provided there is a valid arbitration agreement. However, once a Section 7 petition is admitted, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) commences, the proceeding becomes in rem, and the rights of all stakeholders are affected. At that stage, reference to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act is not permissible, as it would defeat the object, timelines, and collective nature of the insolvency process. Thus, an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot be filed or entertained after the admission of a Section 7 IBC petition. Arbitration is permissible only prior to admission, and only where the Adjudicating Authority finds that no default exists. In light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Indus Biotech, arbitration under Section 8 is barred after admission of insolvency proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC, but may be permitted before admission, if the dispute does not disclose a debt or default.
Topics: Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 & IBC
Related Questions in this Topic
- Buddhi Mediation Associates is a firm consisting of 80 mediators. Out of these, 25 Mediators have more than 15 years of ...
- In Zoya Soft Limited, a mid-sized organization, conflicts have arisen between two project teams leading to frequent dela...
- Analyse the validity of the following with reference to the Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016: Sumu, a...
- Analyse the validity of the following with reference to the Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016: Nirma, ...
- The Chief Executive Officer of the Mediation Council of India, approaches a renowned Professional firm Anup Das LLP, in ...