The Board of Meghank Technologies Ltd. convened a meeting through video conferencing to approve the quarterly financial results. During the meeting, one Director lost connectivity and continued participation via telephon
CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Principles and Practice · PYQS · December 2025
The Board of Meghank Technologies Ltd. convened a meeting through video conferencing to approve the quarterly financial results. During the meeting, one Director lost connectivity and continued participation via telephone for the remaining agenda items. Another Director, who had not given prior intimation of his intention to join electronically, logged in directly through video conferencing. Later, a shareholder challenged the validity of the Board's decisions, qustioning whether the quorum was properly constituted. Examine the legal validity of this board meeting in light of the Companies Act, 2013.
Answer & Explanation:
As per Rule 3 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, participation of directors through video conferencing or other audio-visual means is permitted, subject to prescribed conditions: Telephone Participation Not Counted: If a director loses connectivity and continues through telephone/tele-conferencing, such participation cannot be considered as valid electronic mode participation. His presence will not count for quorum. Prior Intimation Mandatory: A director intending to participate through video conferencing must give prior intimation to enable the company to make suitable arrangements. Participation without such intimation is irregular, though decisions taken are not automatically void if quorum is otherwise met. Quorum Requirement: Quorum must be constituted by directors present either physically or validly through electronic mode. Since one director's telephone presence cannot be counted, quorum has to be re-verified excluding him. The meeting is valid only if quorum was satisfied excluding the director connected via telephone. However, non-intimation by another director does not invalidate the meeting per se, but is a procedural irregularity. The Company Secretary must ensure compliance in future to avoid legal challenges.
Topics: Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- Mehr Fashions Ltd, is a public limited company, promoted by five founders. It manufactures textiles and is well known fo...
- Keyor Infoware Private Ltd., a Bengaluru-based technology company, has grown significantly in the last decade, specializ...
- 'There are several standards and guidelines that organizations can use to conduct sustainability audits.' Explain.
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Reporting protocols aim to cover a wide range of ESG issues. GRI offers environmental ...
- Pheonix Ltd is among top 200 companies in terms of market capitalization of various companies listed on the stock exchan...