Mehr Fashions Ltd, is a public limited company, promoted by five founders. It manufactures textiles and is well known for its brand 'Flash' As part of its expansion plans and also to raise funds from PE firms, the founde
CS Professional · Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Principles and Practice · PYQS · June 2026
Mehr Fashions Ltd, is a public limited company, promoted by five founders. It manufactures textiles and is well known for its brand 'Flash' As part of its expansion plans and also to raise funds from PE firms, the founders were evaluating to appoint new Directors, who would not only contribute to the Company's strategic growth, but also help in expanding its business. One of the founders Mahik, holds 26% equity in Klothing Private Ltd ('Klothing'). He proposed that if the Company enters into an agreement with Klothing, it can procure raw materials at reasonable price, thereby increasing the profit margin. He recommended the Company Secretary, to take up this agreement for Board approval in the upcoming meeting and said that he would brief the other Board members, to ensure that this agreement is approved. He also suggested that, there was no requirement to inform the Board about his holding in Klothing, as it would not impact the decision. With reference to provisions of Companies Act, 2013, comment whether Mahik's contention is justified?
Answer & Explanation:
In terms of Section 184(2) of the Companies Act, 2013, every director of a company who is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, concerned or interested in a contract or arrangement or proposed contract or arrangement entered into or to be entered into with a body corporate in which such director or such director in association with any other director, holds more than two per cent. shareholding of that body corporate, or is a promoter, manager, Chief Executive Officer of that body corporate, shall disclose the nature of his concern or interest at the meeting of the Board in which the contract or arrangement is discussed and shall not participate in such meeting. Further, as per Section 166 of the Act, a director of a company shall not involve in a situation in which he may have a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interest of the company. Mahik is the founder of Mehr Fashions Ltd. and based on the facts of the case, it is assumed that Mahik is not a Director on the Board of the Company. Therefore, the provisions related to Disclosure of Interest by Director under Section 184 of the Act and Duties of Directors under Section 166 of the Act, as not applicable on Mahik. In view of this, he is not debarred from participating in the Board Meeting in which the agreement with Klothing Private Limited is proposed to be placed for approval and Mahik is also not mandatorily required to disclose his shareholding in Klothing Private Limited as he shall not be a part of decision-making process in the meeting, though the Board must still independently consider the transaction in compliance with the Act.
Topics: Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- Keyor Infoware Private Ltd., a Bengaluru-based technology company, has grown significantly in the last decade, specializ...
- The Board of Meghank Technologies Ltd. convened a meeting through video conferencing to approve the quarterly financial ...
- 'There are several standards and guidelines that organizations can use to conduct sustainability audits.' Explain.
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Reporting protocols aim to cover a wide range of ESG issues. GRI offers environmental ...
- Pheonix Ltd is among top 200 companies in terms of market capitalization of various companies listed on the stock exchan...