Arjun, the promoter shareholder of Viru Sports Accessories Private Limited, agreed to sell 25% of the company's equity shareholding to Kavin, a strategic investor, through a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) executed betwee
CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · PYQS · June 2026
Arjun, the promoter shareholder of Viru Sports Accessories Private Limited, agreed to sell 25% of the company's equity shareholding to Kavin, a strategic investor, through a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) executed between the parties. The agreement recorded the purchase consideration, payment schedule, representations and warranties relating to the company's financial statements and an arbitration clause for dispute resolution. However, the agreement did not contain several clauses that are normally expected in a contemporary acquisition transaction, including provisions relating to indemnification for undisclosed liabilities, conditions precedent to closing, disclosure schedules, limitation of liability and governing law. Six months after completion of the transaction, Kavin discovered that the company had substantial undisclosed tax liabilities arising from past regulatory assessments which were not disclosed during negotiations, even these points were not known to Arjun. Hence, both Arjun and Kavin re-negotiated the deal and Arjun agreed to enhance Kavin's equity stake to 33%. Now, both want to execute a comprehensive agreement to cover the risks of both the parties. On this background answer the following questions: Evaluate the legal role of representations and warranties in acquisition agreements and explain how they operate as mechanisms for risk allocation and post-transaction remedies.
Answer & Explanation:
Role of Representations and Warranties in Acquisition Agreements In Acquisition Agreements, representations and warranties serve as critical contractual assurances by the seller regarding the company's financial position, compliance, and absence of liabilities, governed by principles under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. They perform a dual function: risk disclosure and risk allocation. By making specific representations (e.g., no undisclosed tax liabilities), the seller assumes responsibility for their accuracy. If such statements prove false, they constitute misrepresentation or breach of warranty, giving rise to post-transaction remedies such as damages or indemnification. From a risk allocation perspective, warranties shift pre-closing risks to the seller, while the buyer relies on them instead of exhaustive due diligence. In the absence of express indemnity clauses, the buyer may still claim damages for breach. Thus, representations and warranties operate as protective mechanisms, ensuring transparency, allocating liability for undisclosed risks, and enabling the buyer to seek compensation for losses discovered after completion. The representations and warranties thus function as both pre-closing due diligence tools and post-closing remedies (providing enforceable claims for breach), effectively allocating the risk of unknown or undisclosed liabilities to the seller who made the warranties.
Topics: Acquisition Agreements
Related Questions in this Topic
- Arjun, the promoter shareholder of Viru Sports Accessories Private Limited, agreed to sell 25% of the company's equity s...
- Regulatory and quasi-judicial authorities play a significant role in corporate governance and compliance. In this backdr...
- Kris Infra Limited (Referred as 'Kris Infra'), a large construction company engaged in commercial real estate developmen...
- Kris Infra Limited (Referred as 'Kris Infra'), a large construction company engaged in commercial real estate developmen...
- A civil suit is filed by Arvind against Birbal for recovery of money based on an alleged agreement. The Court issues sum...