A charge in favour of a public financial institution to secure a sum of ₹300 crore was not created by Dream House Construction Ltd. within the statutory period and the Company Law Board on an application made by the comp
CS Professional · Secretarial Audit, Compliance Management and Due Diligence · PYQS · June 2014
A charge in favour of a public financial institution to secure a sum of ₹300 crore was not created by Dream House Construction Ltd. within the statutory period and the Company Law Board on an application made by the company, did not grant the extension of time. Is it possible to revive the said charge ?
Topics: Company Law and Charges
Related Questions in this Topic
- A company "issuer" was in the process of making an offer to Right Issue of the specified securities. All the process was...
- You as a practising Company Secretary has been approached by Popular Bank to carry out due diligence regarding the loan ...
- 'The successful merger demands that strategic planners are sensitive to the human issues of the organizations'. For this...
- Distinguish between the following: ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 14004:2016 on environmental management systems.
- Distinguish between the following: Relevant Geographic Market and Relevant Product Market.