Amit, the director of Smile Ltd., did not attend the meetings of the Board of directors of the company during the last twelve months with the leave of absence. Comment on his status as director.
CS Professional · Secretarial Audit, Compliance Management and Due Diligence · PYQS · June 2015
Amit, the director of Smile Ltd., did not attend the meetings of the Board of directors of the company during the last twelve months with the leave of absence. Comment on his status as director.
Answer & Explanation:
Section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with vacation of office of director. Section 167 (1) (b) provides that the office of a director shall become vacant in case he absents himself from all the meetings of the Board of Directors held during a period of twelve months with or without seeking leave of absence of the Board. Hence, in the given case, though Mr. Amit, the Director of the Smile Ltd. has taken the leave of absence from the board, the office of director shall become vacant, as section 167 clearly states that "with or without seeking leave of absence" for the said purpose.
Topics: Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- Write the short notes on the following: Inspection of Register of Charges.
- LMN Ltd. incorporated with paid-up capital of ₹40 Crore. During the financial year 2019-20, the paid-up capital was incr...
- List out the check points to be observed by Company Secretary in practice while conducting the Secretarial Audit with re...
- What are the powers vested with Board of Directors under section 179(3) of the Companies Act, 2013? Can any power be del...
- The date of approval of Financial Statements by the Board of Directors of PQR Ltd. is 17th July, 2020 and the date of no...