Raj Sugars Ltd. is a manufacturer of sugar. The sugar manufactured by the company is sold to government for free supply and in the open market. The Government, to meet the market demand fluctuations, directed the sugar c

CS Professional · Advanced Tax Laws and Practice · PYQS · December 2016
Raj Sugars Ltd. is a manufacturer of sugar. The sugar manufactured by the company is sold to government for free supply and in the open market. The Government, to meet the market demand fluctuations, directed the sugar companies to maintain buffer stock. Also, the Government is giving subsidy to the sugar companies to meet out the storage, interest and insurance charges. Accordingly, Raj Sugars Ltd. received subsidy of ₹7,00,000. The Department contended that the subsidy earned by the company from the Government is an income earned from the service of storage and warehousing of goods and hence, taxable. Do you accept the contention of the Department? Support your argument with a suitable case law.

Answer & Explanation:

In this case the assessee i.e. Raj Sugar Ltd. is storing its own manufactured sugars in its godown as per the directions of the government. Basically, the company is a manufacturer of goods and not storage & warehouse keeper. The subsidy received from the government is not an income. It is an amount given to meet out certain expenses incurred by the assessee to maintain buffer stock as per the government directions. Further, the assessee has received subsidy not on account of services rendered to the government, but is paid as compensation on account of loss of interest, cost of maintenance, cost of insurance etc. Therefore, the subsidy is not taxable as it was also decided in the case of CCE v/s Nahar Industrial Enterprises . Therefore, the contention of the department is not valid as per law.

Topics: Indirect Tax

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic