Capital rationing does not lead to optimum results. Discuss.
CS Professional · Financial, Treasury and Forex Management · PYQS · December 2016
Capital rationing does not lead to optimum results. Discuss.
Answer & Explanation:
A firm may put a limit to the maximum amount that can be invested during a given period of time, such as a year. Such a firm is then said to be resorting to capital rationing. A firm with capital rationing constraint attempts to select the combination of investment projects that will be within the specified limits of investments to be made during a given period of time and at the same time provide greatest profitability. Capital rationing may be effected through budget ceiling. It may result in accepting several small investment proposals than accepting a few large investment proposals so that there may be full utilisation of budget ceiling. This may result in accepting relatively less profitable investment proposals if full utilization of budget is a primary consideration. Similarly, capital rationing can also lead to the firm foregoing the next most profitable investment falling after the budget ceiling even though it is estimated to yield a rate of return much higher than the required rate of return. Thus, capital rationing does not lead to optimum results.
Topics: Capital Budgeting
Related Questions in this Topic
- The MNO company is considering an investment in one of the two mutually exclusive proposals. Project A which involves an...
- Distinguish between the following: Average Accounting Rate of Return and Internal Rate of Return.
- Comment on the following: Sensitivity analysis does not make any decision of itself.
- The following investment proposals are competing for selection. The Profitability Index (PI) of each of these proposals ...
- Distinguish between the following: Capital budgeting and Capital rationing.