Sandeep had availed Housing Loan from SBI through whom he had been enrolled as a member of a Group Insurance Scheme on 12.09.2016, specifically designed for Housing Loan Borrowers of SBI group by SBI Life Ins. Co. In the
CS Professional · Insurance - Law and Practice · PYQS · June 2019
Sandeep had availed Housing Loan from SBI through whom he had been enrolled as a member of a Group Insurance Scheme on 12.09.2016, specifically designed for Housing Loan Borrowers of SBI group by SBI Life Ins. Co. In the good health declaration signed by him he had mentioned that he was never hospitalized for any critical illness or a condition requiring medical treatment for a critical illness as on date. This being a group insurance, no medical examination was carried out at the time of granting insurance cover. It is to be noted that unlike in individual proposal, where specific answer Yes or No are sought, for the questions on health, are not asked in the application for Group Insurance. Proposal form contains a Good Health Declaration clause where Sandeep had declared that he was in sound health. But unfortunately, Sandeep died on 18.01.2017 within 4 months 11 days of enrolling himself as a member of the Group scheme. The insurer denied the claim and alleged that Sandeep has suppressed material facts of his suffering from chronic liver disease. To establish pre proposal illness the insurer has submitted two discharge summaries in respect of hospitalization of the deceased life assured. As per the discharge summary of GEM hospital Sandeep was admitted on 13.07.2016 and discharged on 14.07.2016. X- Ray and Scanning reports of Abdomen revealed shrunken liver with coarse Cho pattern splenomegaly, cirrhosis of liver with portal hypertension. The patient was diagnosed for colitis and treated. The above hospitalization is prior to the date of proposal i.e. 12.09.2016. Subsequent to the date of proposal Sandeep was admitted at KMC Hospital Coimbatore on 23.11.2016 and discharged on 2.12.2016. He was diagnosed for Alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with portal HT, c/o abdominal distension, swelling of both legs. One of the Critical illness is defined in the policy as irreversible kidney/or irreversible liver failure. On a perusal of various documents it has been clearly established that Sandeep had concealed preexisting illness of Alcoholic Cirrhosis of liver disease, portal hypertension. It was also established that Sandeep was an alcoholic and smoker. Hence the insurer has denied the claim with the established material facts of his suffering from chronic liver disease. Sandeep's wife dissatisfied with the denial of the claim, filed a complaint against the insurance company and asks for a remedial action. Ombudsman in resolving this dispute analyzed the case on the following lines: Since on the date of proposal Sandeep had felt that he was in good health and declared that he was in sound health cannot be faulted. Further there was no evidence to say that he was ill on the date he signed the application. As per the insurer, the critical illness not disclosed in the present case is chronic liver disease. The terminology used in while defining critical illness is Irreversible Liver Failure. One cannot come to conclusion that Sandeep was suffering from irreversible Liver failure since as per records he was suffering from cirrhosis of liver. Further Sandeep may not be aware that he was suffering from Irreversible Liver Failure. Hence, Sandeep cannot be faulted for not disclosing his liver problem. In the present case Sandeep died on 18.01.2017 and, the policy was affected from 12.09.2016. There is a likelihood of his liver having got severely affected during the period of 4 months, in which case he has failed to make a true declaration to that effect before the insurer. Considering all facts and in order to render justice to both the parties an ex gratia amount of ₹1,00,000 is awarded by the Ombudsman in full and final settlement of the claim. The complaint is partially allowed. Based on the case given above, deal with the following issues: Can she approach the Grievance Redressal Mechanism? State the Guidelines as laid by IRDAI?
Answer & Explanation:
She can approach the Grievance Redressal Mechanism as per the IRDAI guidelines and present her case before the ombudsman. IRDA Guidelines for Grievance Redressal: In order to enforce timely redressal of Customer grievance, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has issued guidelines for grievance redressal by insurance companies. A Grievance is defined as an expression of dissatisfaction by a customer on the action or inaction on the standard of service or deficiency of service of an insurance company or any intermediary and asks for remedial action. It is distinguished from inquiry or a request which is seeking information or requesting for a service and are not considered as Grievances. Every insurance company shall have a designated senior officer at the level of CEO or Compliance Officer of the Company as the Grievance Officer. Further every office of the insurer shall also have a designated Grievance officer for such office. The process for handling a Grievance is as follows: Every grievance shall be acknowledged within 3 working days of receipt of grievance, containing the name and designation of the person who will deal with the grievance. The Grievance redressal procedure including the time taken for resolution of disputes shall be mentioned in the acknowledgement. Normally a Grievance shall be resolved within 3 days. However, where it is not possible to resolve within 3 days, the insurer shall resolve the complaint within 2 weeks and shall send a final letter of resolution. Where a complaint is rejected, the reasons shall be clearly stated along with the recourse available if the customer is still dissatisfied. Further if the insurer shall inform the customer that if the customer does not come back within weeks from the date of providing resolution, the grievance shall be treated as closed. A grievance can be closed only if the following conditions are satisfied: Where the insurance company has acceded to customer's grievance, upon acceding to the request of the customer. Where the insurance company rejects the customer's grievance, upon receipt of a communication from customer accepting the company's resolution. Where the insurance company rejects the customer's grievance and the customer does not respond within 8 weeks of receipt of resolution, upon completion of the 8 weeks. In all the above instances, the Grievance Redressal Officer shall certify that the Insurance company has discharged its contractual, statutory or regulatory obligations. Every insurance company shall publish the Grievance Redressal Procedure in the website of the insurance company. The Policyholders Protection Committee of the Insurance Company shall receive reports concerning Grievances and shall monitor the process of handling grievances.
Topics: Grievance Redressal
Related Questions in this Topic
- Sandeep had availed Housing Loan from SBI through whom he had been enrolled as a member of a Group Insurance Scheme on 1...
- Sandeep had availed Housing Loan from SBI through whom he had been enrolled as a member of a Group Insurance Scheme on 1...
- Discuss the role of insurance and reinsurance in risk management.
- "Claims settlement in general insurance is a multitasking activity". Discuss.
- Write short notes on the following: Ceiling on Investments u/s 27.