GP Scraps, imported during August 2018, by sea, a consignment of metal scrap weighing 8,000 M.T. from China and filed a bill of entry for home consumption. The Assistant Commissioner passed an order for clearance of good

CS Professional · Advanced Tax Laws and Practice · PYQS · June 2019
GP Scraps, imported during August 2018, by sea, a consignment of metal scrap weighing 8,000 M.T. from China and filed a bill of entry for home consumption. The Assistant Commissioner passed an order for clearance of goods and applicable duty was paid on the goods. GP Scraps thereafter found, on taking delivery from the Port Trust Authorities (i.e. before the clearance for home consumption), that only 7,500 M.T. of scrap was available at the docks, although they had paid duty for the entire 8,000 M.T., as there was no short-landing of cargo had been indicated. The short-delivery of 500 M.T. was also substantiated by the Port-Trust Authorities, who gave a "weighment certificate" to GP Scraps. On filing a representation to the Customs Department, GP Scraps has been directed by the Department in writing to justify as to which provision of the Customs Act, 1962 governs their claim for remission of duty on the 500 M.T. not delivered by the Port-Trust to them. You are approached by GP Scraps as 'Counsel' for an opinion/advice. Examine the issues and tender your opinion as per law, giving reasons.

Answer & Explanation:

Remission of Customs duty As per the provisions of section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962 where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs that any imported goods have been lost (otherwise than as a result of pilferage) or destroyed, at any time before clearance for home consumption, the Assistant Commissioner of Customs or Deputy Commissioner of Customs shall remit the duty on such goods. Therefore the duty shall be remitted only, if loss has occurred before clearance for home consumption. In the given case, it is apparent from the facts that quantity of scrap received in India was 8000 metric tons and 500 metric tons thereof was lost when it was in custody of Port Authorities i.e., before clearance for home consumption. The loss of 500 M.T of scrap cannot be construed to be pilferage, as loss of such huge quantity cannot be treated as "Petty Theft". Hence, GP Scraps is being advised to take shelter under section 23 of Customs Act, 1962 justifying its claim for remission of duty on the goods short supplied by the Port Trust Authorities as per certificate issued.

Topics: Customs Act, 1962

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic