Barun Ojha, as a bachelor, took a life policy "Poorna Suraksha" from ABC Life and named his father Tarun as his nominee. During the tenure of the policy, he married Sujata Jha, but he did not change the nomination in his
CS Professional · Insurance - Law and Practice · PYQS · December 2020
Barun Ojha, as a bachelor, took a life policy "Poorna Suraksha" from ABC Life and named his father Tarun as his nominee. During the tenure of the policy, he married Sujata Jha, but he did not change the nomination in his policy. Subsequently, Barun died of a heart attack when the policy was still in force. His wife Sujata lodged a claim with the insurance company; simultaneously Barun's father Tarun also filed a claim as the official nominee of the deceased. Insurance company found the claim under the policy justified but does not want a confrontation with the two parties staking the claim, as they do not want to take any risk of being questioned for the wrong payment from their behalf if they make payment to any one of them. They wanted that both the parties should amicably settle the issue off the court or get it settled through a legal process before it can make any payment to any one of them. In which case the provisions of Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938 do not apply.
Answer & Explanation:
The provisions of Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938 are not applicable to any life insurance policy to which Section 6 of Married Women's Property Act, 1874 applies or has at any time applied except where before or after Insurance Laws (Amendment) 2014, a nomination is made in favour of spouse or children or spouse and children whether or not on the face of the Policy it is mentioned that it is made under Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938. Where nomination is intended to be made to spouse or children or spouse and children under Section 6 of Married Women's Property Act, 1874, it should be specifically mentioned on the Policy. In such a case only, the provisions of Section 39 of Insurance Act, 1938 will not apply.
Topics: Life Insurance
Related Questions in this Topic
- Mr. J who governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, died intestate on June 15, 1967 leaving behind his son. Mr. A (pla...
- Mr. J who governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, died intestate on June 15, 1967 leaving behind his son. Mr. A (pla...
- Mr. J who governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, died intestate on June 15, 1967 leaving behind his son. Mr. A (pla...
- If a person wants to assign the policy to another person without a valid consideration, what conditions must be fulfille...
- List out the circumstances under which the life insurer may apply, to pay the amount into the court to obtain a satisfac...