Janak Poly Fibres Ltd. is an Indian company having registered office in Mumbai and John Stuart LLP is a non-resident Singapore base company. There have been a series of international transactions between both these compa
CS Professional · Advanced Tax Laws and Practice · PYQS · December 2020
Janak Poly Fibres Ltd. is an Indian company having registered office in Mumbai and John Stuart LLP is a non-resident Singapore base company. There have been a series of international transactions between both these companies since last so many years. Janak Poly Fibres Ltd. has entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) on 10th January, 2020 to determine the ALP for the transactions entered with John Stuart LLP by stating that P.Y. 2019-20 is the first of the consecutive previous years. The rate adopted under the Advance Pricing Agreement is ₹ 13,500 per MT. The assessments for the assessment years 2012-13 to 2017-18 of Janak Poly Fibres Ltd. have been completed on various dates and in these years, the ALP determined and taken for the A.Y. 2012-13 to 2015-16 was ₹ 13,000 per MT and of ₹ 14,000 per MT for A.Y. 2016-17 and 2017-18. The quantity involved was 2 lakhs MT in each of these years respectively. Assessments for the subsequent assessment years for 2018-19 and 2019-20 are pending and yet to be completed. The assessee had adopted the value of ₹ 13,200 per MT in both the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20. In the backdrop of the above and taking note of the aforesaid information, you are required to answer the following; considering the transfer pricing provisions and the provisions contained under the Income Tax Act, 1961: (ii) In the given situation and the set of facts, state the year for which the APA cannot be applied.
Answer & Explanation:
Assumption: The solution has been made based on the assumption that Janak Poly Fibers Ltd. (Indian Company) was making sales to John Stuart LLP (Non-Resident) Singapore base company. Rollback provisions cannot be applied where the same would result in reduction of Income. In the given situation, when the APA is applied for the A.Y. 2016-17 and 2017-18, the ALP per MT will be lower by ₹ 500 per MT (as taken in these years at ₹ 14000 per MT whereas under APA is ₹ 13,500 per MT) which when be applied on 2 lakh MT, the income would be lower by ₹ 10 crores. Hence rollback cannot be applied for AY 2016-17 and AY 2017-18. However, for all other years being AY 2018-19 and AY 2019-20 it has to be mandatorily applied.
Topics: Income Tax Act, 1961
Related Questions in this Topic
- Explain meaning of Reverse Merger. List down the benefits available in it.
- A Ltd. has some plant and machinery in a block of assets whose written down value on 1st April, 2020 was ₹50,00,000. The...
- Sangeeth acquired a house property for ₹2,00,000 on 10th June, 1976. He incurred the following expenses to make some add...
- Incomes earned during a previous year are always taxable in the assessment year. Do you agree? Explain with reasons.
- From the following information given by Duke Ltd., for the Previous Year 2020-21, compute the tax payable by it for the ...