Smith is a Swiss national and also the Managing Director (MD) of Front India Ltd. The said company had obtained loan from consortium of banks to a tune of ₹12,000 crore. There are about 9 banks involved in providing the
CS Professional · Secretarial Audit, Compliance Management and Due Diligence · PYQS · December 2020
Smith is a Swiss national and also the Managing Director (MD) of Front India Ltd. The said company had obtained loan from consortium of banks to a tune of ₹12,000 crore. There are about 9 banks involved in providing the loan. Loan was granted in November 2014. The company was regular at its payment of interest and loan instalment as per agreed terms and conditions of loan agreement till November 2017. However due to downfall of business, the company could not pay its interest and loan instalment since November 2017. There were also reports that the company is irregular at its salary payments to its employees since December 2018 and the MD is absconding as he fled out of India and settled in Switzerland. The banks have decided to approach the court to declare the company as 'willful defaulter'. The company has sufficient assets to meet its obligations to the banks. The Board is divided on the opinion on the claims made by the consortium of banks and is contemplating to defend the case in the court in not declaring the company as a 'willful defaulter'. As a Company Secretary in Practice, examine the above situation and advise the consortium of banks whether they will succeed in their claim before the Court of Law.
Answer & Explanation:
The said matter is to be examined whether it would fit into the definition of "Willful default". A "willful default" would be deemed to have occurred if any of the following events is noted: The company has defaulted in meeting its payment/repayment obligations to the lender even when it has the capacity to honour the said obligations. The company has defaulted in meeting its payment/repayment obligations to the lender and has not utilised the finance from the lender for the specific purposes for which finance was availed of but has diverted the funds for other purposes. The company has defaulted in meeting its payment/repayment obligations to the lender and has siphoned off the funds so that the funds have not been utilised for the specific purpose for which finance was availed of, nor are the funds available with the unit in the form of other assets. In order to prevent the access to the capital markets by the willful defaulters, a copy of the list of willful defaulters (non-suit filed accounts) and list of willful defaulters (suit-filed accounts) are forwarded to SEBI by RBI and Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd. (CIBIL) respectively. In the given case, Smith has borrowed money on behalf of the Company and nowhere it is stated that it was utilised other than purpose for which it was borrowed. Also the Company has sufficient assets to repay the loan and the Board of Directors can always dispose the assets to pay the liabilities. Non Payment of the salary to the employees or the MD's disappearance from India, can not be ground in declaring a Company a "wilful defaulter". With these facts in place, the consortium of banks will not succeed in their claim before the Court of Law.
Topics: Banking Law / Corporate Governance
Related Questions in this Topic
- A company "issuer" was in the process of making an offer to Right Issue of the specified securities. All the process was...
- You as a practising Company Secretary has been approached by Popular Bank to carry out due diligence regarding the loan ...
- 'The successful merger demands that strategic planners are sensitive to the human issues of the organizations'. For this...
- Distinguish between the following: ISO 14001:2015 and ISO 14004:2016 on environmental management systems.
- Distinguish between the following: Relevant Geographic Market and Relevant Product Market.