Amit and Brij are jointly tried for the murder of Nirmala. It is proved that Amit had said, "Brij and I had murdered Nirmala." Does it amount to a confessional statement? Can the court consider the effect of this stateme
CS Executive · Industrial, Labour & General Laws · PYQS · December 2013
Amit and Brij are jointly tried for the murder of Nirmala. It is proved that Amit had said, "Brij and I had murdered Nirmala." Does it amount to a confessional statement? Can the court consider the effect of this statement as against Brij? Give reasons and refer to relevant provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Topics: Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Related Questions in this Topic
- The term evidence is defined in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 under :
- Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides that the contents of a document must be proved:
- Which of the following are privileged communication under Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
- Which of the following is not a judicial confession?
- The facts which form part of the same transaction are relevant :