Raj was a member of the Board of directors of a company. On being made liable for an offence punishable under the Factories Act, 1948, he contended that he was not an 'occupier' of the factory of the company and hence, h
CS Executive · Industrial, Labour & General Laws · PYQS · December 2013
Raj was a member of the Board of directors of a company. On being made liable for an offence punishable under the Factories Act, 1948, he contended that he was not an 'occupier' of the factory of the company and hence, he was exempt from any liability. Will Raj succeed in his contention? Give reasons referring to the case law on the point.
Topics: Factories Act, 1948
Related Questions in this Topic
- Relation of first Schedule of the Factories Act, 1948 is with the :
- Penalty for using false certificate of fitness under the Factories Act, 1948 is:
- Sec. 7B of the Factories Act, 1948 provides:
- Under which of the sections of the Factories Act, 1948 a notice of taking the charge of 'Occupier" be given by the Occup...
- Explanation of Section 2(m) of the Factories Act, 1948 relates to: