In some torts, the defendant is held liable even though the harm caused to the plaintiff is without intention or negligence on the part of the defendant. Thus, the defendant is held liable without fault. This is based on
CS Executive · Industrial, Labour & General Laws · PYQS · December 2014
In some torts, the defendant is held liable even though the harm caused to the plaintiff is without intention or negligence on the part of the defendant. Thus, the defendant is held liable without fault. This is based on the rule of strict liability which was first laid down in the case of __________.
Answer & Explanation:
Correct Answer: Option (A)
Correct answer: (A) Rylands vs. Fletcher. This answer applies to the historical law and assessment-year context of this December 2014 paper; later amendments may differ.
Topics: Law of Torts
Related Questions in this Topic
- 'A', a warehouse-keeper, is charged with the delivery of certain goods to Z, which B takes out of A's possession. Advise...
- Which one of the following is not the exception of rule of strict liability defined under law relating to torts ?
- Gloucestour Grammer School case is about:
- A shakes first under the nose of B. It amounts to:
- Which of the following judicial remedies are available in an action of tort?