As per section 1(3) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 the casual or temporary workmen are not included under this Act. In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has given thi

CS Executive · Industrial, Labour & General Laws · PYQS · December 2020
As per section 1(3) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 the casual or temporary workmen are not included under this Act. In which of the following cases the Supreme Court has given this verdict ?
(A) P.F. Inspector Vs. Hariharan
(B) Bikaner Cold Storage Co. Ltd. Vs. Regional P.F. Commissioner, Rajasthan
(C) Delhi Cloth and General Mills Vs. R.P.F. Commissioner
(D) P.G. Textiles Mills Vs. Union of India.

Answer & Explanation:

Correct Answer: Option (A)

Official answer key: (A).

Topics: Industrial Law

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic