Atul travelled by railway from Kanpur to Lucknow, after purchasing a ticket from the Railway Authorities. When he tried to alight at Lucknow railway station in the darkness, the train started without a whistle. He fell d
CS Executive · Economic and Commercial Laws · PYQS · December 2020
Atul travelled by railway from Kanpur to Lucknow, after purchasing a ticket from the Railway Authorities. When he tried to alight at Lucknow railway station in the darkness, the train started without a whistle. He fell down and his legs were chopped off by the wheels of the train. Atul filed a suit against this. The Railway Authorities contended that the fault was of the Electricity Distribution Company, who failed to supply the electricity at that time. Decide, whether the contention of Railway Authorities is tenable ? Is it a deficiency in the service on the part of the Railway Authorities, under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
Answer & Explanation:
According to Section 2(1)(g) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, deficiency means any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained by or under any law for the time being in force or has been undertaken to be performed by a person in pursuance of a contract or otherwise in relation to any service. The terms consumer and service are defined under Section 2 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as well. Passengers travelling by trains on payment of the stipulated fare charged for the ticket are 'consumers' and the facility of transportation by rail provided by the railway administration is a 'service' rendered for consideration as defined in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Failure to maintain the quality of performance required by the law or failure to provide services as per warranties given, by the provider of the service would amount to 'deficiency'. In given problem Atul travelled by railway is a consumer and Atul suffered injury due to deficiency of service of railway. Hence the contention of the Railway Authority that it was the fault of the electricity distribution company who failed to supply electricity at that point in time, is not tenable. Not providing the proper and required facilities will be covered under the deficiency in service as per the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and Railway Authority is liable to compensate to Atul.
Topics: Consumer Protection Act
Related Questions in this Topic
- In the following cases, state with reasons if the trust is created under The Trusts Act, 1882: A bequeaths certain pro...
- A made a gift of a house in favour of B and handed over the deed to B. But before presenting the same for registration A...
- An industry during manufacturing operation had caused major leakage of harmful gas and was ordered to be closed down by ...
- A sub-registrar refuses to register a document on the ground of undervaluation for stamp duty. The person aggrieved with...
- The Micro, Small and Enterprises Development Act, 2006 empowers the Central Government to constitute an advisory committ...