(B) Matters referred by ABC Professional Services: The partner of the firm have sought opinion in respect of the matters of their clients for filing reply with the tax authorities relating to the show cause notices issue
CS Professional · Direct Tax Law & Practice · PYQS · December 2020
(B) Matters referred by ABC Professional Services: The partner of the firm have sought opinion in respect of the matters of their clients for filing reply with the tax authorities relating to the show cause notices issued indicating to tax the income in India in each of the following cases under the provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961: (iii) PQR Ltd. is an Indian Company manufacturing T-shirts located at Jaipur in Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in which Joly Inc. a US Company is holding 32% shares and voting power. Following transactions were effected between these two companies during the year 2019-20: (a) PQR Ltd sold 1,50,000 pieces of T-shirts at $3 per T-shirt to Joly Inc. The identical T-shirts were sold by PQR Ltd to the unrelated party namely Konny Inc at $4 per T-shirt. (b) PQR Ltd borrowed a loan of $5,00,000 from a foreign lender on the strength of guarantee given by Joly Inc and for the purpose of giving guarantee, PQR Ltd paid $20,000 as guarantee fee to Joly Inc. However, for the same amount of loan taken by an unrelated party, Joly Inc had charged the guarantee fees of an amount of $15,000. (c) PQR Ltd paid $20,000 to Joly Inc for getting the details of various potential customer to improve its business outside India in global market. Joly Inc provided the same services and details to an unrelated party for $15,000. Provide the expert opinion/advice on the matters referred by ABC Professional Services as compiled under 'B' as to: Explain the relationship of the companies PQR Ltd and Joly Inc of US and the nature of various transactions entered into between them during the year 2019-20. Compute the adjustment, if required to be made to the total Income of PQR Ltd under transfer pricing provisions. State whether the company can also claim benefit of deduction under section 10AA of the Act for the enhanced income due to adjustments made by application of transfer pricing provisions. Take the value of one US dollar as ₹75.
Answer & Explanation:
PQR Ltd, an Indian Company, and Joly Inc a US based company are deemed to be Associated Enterprises (AE) as per section 92A(2)(a) of the Income tax Act, 1961. Since Joly Inc holds shares carrying not less than 26% of the voting power in PQR Ltd of India by holding and having 32% of the shares and voting power in the company which is more than 26% to invoke the provisions of section 92A (2)(a) for being an associated enterprises (AE). As per explanation attached to section 92B of the Income tax Act, 1961, the transactions entered into between these two companies for sale of product, lending or guaranteeing the lender and provision of services relating to customers and market research (as being entered into between the two companies) are included within the meaning of "international transaction". Accordingly, transfer pricing provisions would be attracted and the income arising from such international transactions have to be computed having regard to the arm's length price (ALP). In this case, from the information given, the arm's length price (ALP) has to be determined and computed by taking the comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method which is the most appropriate method since details of transactions entered into with the unrelated party are available. Amount by which the total income of PQR Ltd is to be enhanced on account of adjustments to be made under CUP method in the value of International Transactions between the Company and Joly Inc shall be: S. No Particulars ₹ in lacs a) Difference in the price of the T-shirts being @ $1 each for 1,50,000 pieces sold to Joly Inc. ($1 x 1,50,000 x ₹75) 1,12,50,000 b) Difference for excess payment of guarantee fee paid to Joly Inc for loan borrowed from foreign lender being difference between the amounts paid compared with payment made by unrelated party. ($20000 - $15000) = $5000 x 75 3,75,000 c) Difference for excess payment for services to Joly Inc relating to customers details for market improvement compared with payment made by unrelated party being ($20000 - $15000) = $5000 x 75 3,75,000 Total Income to be enhanced 1,20,00,000 PQR Ltd cannot claim deduction under section 10AA of the Income tax Act, 1961 in respect of ₹120 lakh being the amount of income by which the total income is to be enhanced by virtue of the first proviso to section 92C(4) of the Act.
Topics: International Taxation
Related Questions in this Topic
- Ayush Motors Limited an Indian Company declared income of ₹ 300 crore computed in accordance with Chapter IV-D but befor...
- (B) Matters referred by ABC Professional Services: The partner of the firm have sought opinion in respect of the matte...
- (B) Matters referred by ABC Professional Services: The partner of the firm have sought opinion in respect of the matte...
- Examine and state the correctness or otherwise of each of the following statements in the context of provisions containe...
- Examine and state the correctness or otherwise of each of the following statements in the context of provisions containe...