Under the provisions of a tax treaty between India and Dubai, any capital gains arising from the sale of shares of Sun India Ltd, an Indian Company would be taxable only in Dubai if the transferor is a resident of Dubai

CS Professional · Direct Tax Law & Practice · PYQS · June 2021
Under the provisions of a tax treaty between India and Dubai, any capital gains arising from the sale of shares of Sun India Ltd, an Indian Company would be taxable only in Dubai if the transferor is a resident of Dubai except where the transferor holds more than 10% interest in the capital stock of Sun India Ltd. A company, Gama Inc, being resident in Dubai, makes an investment in Sun India Ltd. through two wholly owned subsidiaries (Fama Inc. and Gama Inc.) located in Dubai. Each subsidiary holds 9.95% shareholding in the Indian Company, the total adding to 19.9% of equity of Sun India Ltd. The subsidiaries sell the shares of Sun India Ltd. and claim exemption as each is holding less than 10% equity shares in the Indian Company. Can GAAR be invoked to deny treaty benefit?

Answer & Explanation:

The above arrangement of splitting the investment through two subsidiaries appears to be with the intention of obtaining tax benefit under the treaty. Further, there appears to be no commercial substance in creating two subsidiaries as they do not change the economic condition of investor Gama Inc. in any manner (i.e. on business risks or cash flow), and reveals a tainted element of abuse of tax laws. Hence, the arrangement would be treated as an impermissible avoidance arrangement by invoking General Anti Avoidance Rules 'GAAR'. Consequently, treaty benefit would be denied by ignoring Fama Inc. and Gama Inc. The two subsidiaries, or by treating Fama Inc. and Gama Inc. as one and the same company for tax computation purposes, profits from sale of shares shall be taxable in India.

Topics: Income Tax Act, 1961

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic