Could you explain with certain citations indicating exceptions to the Majority Rule Held in Foss Vs Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461 (Ch.)?

No need to take the views of majority if there is allegation of ultra vires acts by the Management held in Dhaneswari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Nilkamal Chakravarthy [1937] 7 Comp. Cas. 417 (Cal) . Similarly, the allegation of fraud is an exception as was held in Cook v. Deeks (1916)1AC 554 (PC) . Where majority is wrongdoer and pocket property of company, an individual shareholder has right to file a suit. Menier v. Hooper's Telegraph Works (1874)9 Ch. App. 350 (CA) . A minority of shareholder in saddle of power cannot be allowed to pursue a policy of venturing into a litigation to which the majority of the shareholders were opposed. Life Insurance Corp of India v. Escorts Ltd (1986) 59 Comp Cas. 548 (SC) . Nevertheless, the principle of Majority Rule prevails normally as held in Foss Vs. Harbottle [1843] 2 Hare 461 (Ch.) until and unless proved beyond doubt the exceptions.