Registrar of Companies (ROC) has sent a Notice to a Company alleging default under Section 92(4) and Section 137(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. On receiving the notice, the Company immediately arranges to file the respec
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2021
Registrar of Companies (ROC) has sent a Notice to a Company alleging default under Section 92(4) and Section 137(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. On receiving the notice, the Company immediately arranges to file the respective Forms/Returns and communicates within 30 days of the notice that the it has made good the default. However, the ROC proceeded to prosecute the Company for non-compliance under the aforesaid Section. Is the action of the Registrar justified? If so, what may be the penalty for such non-compliances?
Answer & Explanation:
Section 454(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act), provides that the adjudicating officer may, by an order- (a) impose the penalty on the company, the officer who is in default, or any other person, as the case may be, stating therein any non-compliance or default under the relevant provisions of the Act; and (b) direct such company, or officer who is in default, or any other person, as the case may be, to rectify the default, wherever he considers fit. However, a proviso has been to section 454(3) of the Act inserted vide the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 w.e.f. 22.01.2021, which provides as under: In case the default relates to non-compliance of section 92(4) or section 137(1) or 137(2) and such default has been rectified either prior to, or within thirty days of, the issue of the notice by the adjudicating officer, no penalty shall be imposed in this regard and all proceedings under this section in respect of such default shall be deemed to be concluded. Accordingly, in the given case, the Registrar of Companies, who is the designated Adjudicating Officer for levying penalties under the above mentioned provisions is not empowered to proceed to levy penalty if the requisite Forms prescribed under the said provisions have been filed within 30 days of issue of the Notice.
Topics: Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- An investigation has been initiated against Terla Mart Private Ltd under section 210 of the Companies Act, 2013. Mohana,...
- Niruthan and Vanithan, were two close friends and IITians. They had founded a company together called Valuin Technologie...
- 'Class action suit is a new mechanism in India to claim the loss caused to the specified stakeholders of the Company, no...
- Jeyan, filed an application before Usurla Ltd, for transmission of equity shares held by his father. Jeyan provided the ...
- Amin, Director of Tituto Ltd was penalized by Regional Director (RD) for an offence committed by him under the Companies...