Adjudication Officer under the Companies Act, 2013 has sent notice to the Alaya Ltd alleging that the Company had committed certain offences under the Companies Act. The provisions referring the offences as alleged by Ad
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2021
Adjudication Officer under the Companies Act, 2013 has sent notice to the Alaya Ltd alleging that the Company had committed certain offences under the Companies Act. The provisions referring the offences as alleged by Adjudication Officer do not contain any penal provisions. The Management of Alaya Ltd contends that, as no punishment is prescribed under the Act, there is no violation by the Company. Is the contention of the Company valid?
Answer & Explanation:
According to section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, provides for the punishment for non-compliances of those provisions of the Act where no specific Penalty or Punishment is provided. According to said section, if a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in the Companies Act, 2013, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person. Hence, the contention of the company is not valid.
Topics: Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- An investigation has been initiated against Terla Mart Private Ltd under section 210 of the Companies Act, 2013. Mohana,...
- Niruthan and Vanithan, were two close friends and IITians. They had founded a company together called Valuin Technologie...
- 'Class action suit is a new mechanism in India to claim the loss caused to the specified stakeholders of the Company, no...
- Jeyan, filed an application before Usurla Ltd, for transmission of equity shares held by his father. Jeyan provided the ...
- Amin, Director of Tituto Ltd was penalized by Regional Director (RD) for an offence committed by him under the Companies...