Section 442 of the Companies Act, 2013 enables settlement of dispute through 'alternate dispute resolution' - In this context, highlight the differences between mediation and conciliation.

CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2021
Section 442 of the Companies Act, 2013 enables settlement of dispute through 'alternate dispute resolution' - In this context, highlight the differences between mediation and conciliation.

Answer & Explanation:

Section 442(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) provides that the Central Government or the Tribunal (NCLT) or the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) before which any proceeding is pending may, suo motu, refer any matter pertaining to such proceeding to such number of experts from the Mediation and Conciliation Panel as the Central Government or the NCLT or the NCLAT, as the case may be, deems fit. Section 442 of the Act enables settlement of disputes through 'Alternate Dispute Resolution'. Mediation: Mediation is a structured process. The Mediator assists the disputants to reach a negotiable settlement. The Process results in signed agreement which decides the future behaviour of the parties. Further, the decision of the mediator is called "settlement". It is the process by which the parties to a dispute have closed-door discussions on a contentious issue in the presence of neutral mediator(s). This is a voluntary process and is undertaken only if all the parties are willing to go by it. The mediator, who is specially trained, helps the parties move from their positions, towards assessing where their interests are. Then, he/she helps the parties determine how the matter can be settled, examining various options. Unlike formal adjudicatory processes, the mediation need not be confined to the issues raised in the case, but can go beyond to other matters the parties want resolved. They can also agree to disagree on some issues, while resolving the rest. Mediation is a time-bound, private and confidential process. The information shared must be kept confidential by all parties, including the mediator. This facilitates a free and frank discussion on matters in dispute. Equally important, the discussions cannot be brought up before the court if the disputes are not resolved through mediation. In mediation, the mediator does not suggest the manner of settlement to the parties. Any settlement arrived at using either process is voluntary. No settlement can be imposed by the mediator or conciliator. Conciliation: The term "Conciliation" has been defined under black law dictionary as "The process of adjusting or settling disputes in a friendly manner through extra judicial mean". Conciliation is the assistance rendered by a conciliator to the parties to a dispute, in an independent and impartial manner, in their attempt to reach an amicable settlement of their dispute. Conciliator brings the disputants to agreement through negotiation. Further, the Conciliator is appointed only after the dispute has arisen. The decision of the Conciliator is called "award". The conciliation process is similar to mediation. But the conciliator suggests terms for settlement on evaluation of the issues discussed by the parties.

Topics: Alternate Dispute Resolution

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic