Decent Laminates and Plywood Pvt. Ltd imported resin impregnated paper and plywood for the purpose of manufacture of furniture. The goods so imported were warehoused at Mumbai Port from the date of their import in the mo

CS Professional · Advanced Tax Laws · PYQS · December 2021
Decent Laminates and Plywood Pvt. Ltd imported resin impregnated paper and plywood for the purpose of manufacture of furniture. The goods so imported were warehoused at Mumbai Port from the date of their import in the month of June, 2020. Decent Laminates and Plywood Pvt. Ltd sought an extension of the warehousing of goods till November, 2020 which was granted. However, even after the expiry of extended period, it did not remove the goods from the warehouse. Subsequently, Decent Laminates and Plywood Pvt. Ltd applied for remission of duty under section 23 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the ground that the imported goods had become unfit for use on account of non-availability of orders for clearance and had lost their shell life also. Explain, in the context of provisions of Customs Act, 1962 with the help of a decided case law, if any, whether the application for remission of duty filed by Decent Laminates and Plywood Pvt. Ltd is valid in law.

Answer & Explanation:

Remission can be granted under Section 23 only when the imported goods have been lost or destroyed at any time before clearance for home consumption. The expression "at any time before clearance for home consumption" as provided in section 23 means the time period originally fixed and extended period available for warehousing and not after the lapse of such periods. The said expression (at any time before clearance for home consumption) cannot be extended to a period after the lapse of the extended period merely because the goods were not cleared within the stipulated time. It would be a case of goods improperly removed from the warehouse. The facts of the given case are similar to the case of CCEx. vs. Decorative Laminates (I) Pvt. Ltd. [2010] 257 ELT 61 (Ker.). The High Court held that the circumstances made out under section 23 were not applicable in the instant case as the destruction/ loss of the goods had not occurred before the clearance for home consumption. Hence, the application for remission of duty filed by Decent Laminates and Plywood Pvt. Ltd is not valid in law.

Topics: Customs Act

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic