Gaj, Managing Director of MGR Ltd. retired on March 31, 2021 upon attaining superannuation. The Company had allotted residential premises during his tenure, for his stay as part of his remuneration. At the time of full a
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · June 2022
Gaj, Managing Director of MGR Ltd. retired on March 31, 2021 upon attaining superannuation. The Company had allotted residential premises during his tenure, for his stay as part of his remuneration. At the time of full and final settlement of the amounts like gratuity, leave pay and other amounts payable to him, it was noticed that Gaj had let out the Company's leased premises to Val, his distant relative. The management decided to hold back the full and final settlement amount and was considering to file a complaint against Gaj for breach of trust and misuse of Company's property. Is the management's contention tenable?
Answer & Explanation:
As per the provisions of Section 452(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act), if any officer or employee of a company, (a) wrongfully obtains possession of any property, including cash of the company; or (b) having any such property including cash in his possession, wrongfully withholds it or knowingly applies it for the purposes other than those expressed or directed in the articles and authorised by this Act, he shall, on the complaint of the company or of any member or creditor or contributory thereof, be punishable with fine which shall not be less than ₹1 lakh but which may extend to ₹5 Lakh. According to section 452(2) of the Act, the Court trying an offence under section 452(1) may also order such officer or employee to deliver up or refund, within a time to be fixed by it, any such property or cash wrongfully obtained or wrongfully withheld or knowingly misapplied, the benefits that have been derived from such property or cash or in default, to undergo imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years. Further, as per the proviso to section 452(2), which provides that the imprisonment of such officer or employee, as the case may be, shall not be ordered for wrongful possession or withholding of a dwelling unit, if the court is satisfied that the company has not paid to that officer or employee, as the case may be, any amount relating to: a) provident fund, pension fund, gratuity fund or any other fund for the welfare of its officers or employees, maintained by the company; b) compensation or liability for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 in respect of death or disablement. Accordingly, the company may file a complaint against Gaj under section 452(1) of the Act and he may be punished in accordance with section 452(2) along with proviso thereto.
Topics: Companies Act, 2013
Related Questions in this Topic
- An investigation has been initiated against Terla Mart Private Ltd under section 210 of the Companies Act, 2013. Mohana,...
- Niruthan and Vanithan, were two close friends and IITians. They had founded a company together called Valuin Technologie...
- 'Class action suit is a new mechanism in India to claim the loss caused to the specified stakeholders of the Company, no...
- Jeyan, filed an application before Usurla Ltd, for transmission of equity shares held by his father. Jeyan provided the ...
- Amin, Director of Tituto Ltd was penalized by Regional Director (RD) for an offence committed by him under the Companies...