Raman is acting as Resolution Professional (RP) during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Delta Ltd. Subsequently, Raman was also appointed as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of Sigma Ltd. (a who

CS Professional · Insolvency - Law and Practice · PYQS · December 2022
Raman is acting as Resolution Professional (RP) during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Delta Ltd. Subsequently, Raman was also appointed as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) of Sigma Ltd. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Delta Ltd). There was a pre-existing commercial dispute between Delta Ltd. and Sigma Ltd. which was not pursued by the lenders of Sigma Ltd. prior to commencement of CIRP of Delta Ltd. as well as Sigma Ltd. However, during the first meeting of the Committee of Creditors (CoC) of Sigma Ltd. the members of CoC asked Raman to file an application before the Adjudicating Authority in connection with recovery of dues from Delta Ltd. In response to this Raman informed to the members that since he will be filing the application against Delta Ltd. where he himself is an RP; therefore, he proposes to increase his fee to ₹ 1 crore per month from ₹ 3 lacs per month citing complexity in managing the legal issues. Considering the above facts, state whether the actions of Raman to continue to act as RP/IRP as well as demanding higher fees is in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016?

Answer & Explanation:

The IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 makes provisions for the examination and registration of Insolvency Professionals with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. These regulations also make provisions for the disciplinary proceedings against the insolvency professional as well as prescribes a Code of Conduct for insolvency professionals. First schedule to the aforesaid regulations prescribes a Code of Conduct for insolvency professionals. According to regulation 7(2)(h), the registration of an insolvency professional shall be subject to the condition that he shall abide by the following Code of Conduct specified in the First Schedule to the Regulations. Integrity and Objectivity An insolvency professional must disclose the details of any conflict of interests to the stakeholders, whenever he comes across such conflict of interest during an assignment. Considering the above, since Raman is facing a direct conflict of interest because of he being acting as resolution professional in Delta Ltd. and Sigma Ltd. and his actions may get prejudiced; therefore, he shall promptly inform the Committee of Creditors of both the companies about the conflict of interest and tender his resignation from one of the companies to avoid such conflict of interest. Remuneration and Costs As per Regulation 25 of the Code of Conduct, an insolvency professional must provide services for remuneration which is charged in a transparent manner, is a reasonable reflection of the work necessarily and properly undertaken, and is not inconsistent with the applicable regulations. Further Regulation 26 provides that an insolvency professional shall not accept any fees or charges other than those which are disclosed to and approved by the persons fixing his remuneration. Regulation 27 makes it mandatory for an insolvency professional to disclose all costs towards the insolvency resolution process costs, liquidation costs, or costs of the bankruptcy process, as applicable, to all relevant stakeholders, and must endeavour to ensure that such costs are not unreasonable. Considering the above, the fee demanded by Raman is not in accordance with the Code and work to be performed by him.

Topics: Insolvency Professionals

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic