The liberalization process initiated by the Government of India, during the early 1990's witnessed the entry of several private players in the Indian banking sector. ABC Bank (ABCB) was one of the earliest private sector

CS Professional · Banking - Law & Practice · PYQS · December 2022
The liberalization process initiated by the Government of India, during the early 1990's witnessed the entry of several private players in the Indian banking sector. ABC Bank (ABCB) was one of the earliest private sector banks promoted by three former bank executives and was incorporated on October 30, 2004 in Hyderabad. Apart from these three promoters, the Gem Finance Corporation (GFC) and the Gem Bank for Development (GBD) were other major shareholders. ABCB was granted license to operate as a bank by RBI in December, 2004 and the bank offered an array of products and services in retail, wholesale, corporate, treasury and investment banking apart from depository and advisory services. The bank specialized in lending to the engineering, software, energy, telecom, textiles, pharmaceuticals and jewellery sectors. In a short span of five years of operations, the total business of the bank in the year 2009 exceeded ₹ 4 bn making it one of the fastest growing private banks in India. It was also the first among the Indian banks to raise Tier II capital from multilateral institutions. In five years, ABCB's deposits were worth ₹ 3 bn out of which 70 per cent were from retail domestic investors. Its presence in the States of Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu is significant with more than 70 percent of its branches in seven major cities and four metros. Bank had grown tremendously by July, 2015 by having 450 branches in major 234 cities of the country, 875 ATMs, 5800 employees, more than seven millions of depositors with deposits worth ₹ 65 bn and the amount of loans disbursed to different sectors of ₹ 52 bn. Despite all the sound state of affairs, the ABCB started collapsing in the year 2016-17 and its financial health started deteriorating. The reasons identified responsible for the deterioration of bank financial position are many but some important are related with the mistakes committed by the bank's management in advances portfolio, lack of financial control over deposit interest rates, weak credit supervision, negligible corporate governance, indulgence of promoters and the top management in the financing by having collusion with the borrowers. RBI's probe into ABCB's accounts revealed a significant erosion of the bank's net worth and huge number of concealed NPAs accounts. ABCB's attempt to strengthen its capital base from overseas failed due to regulatory problems, resulting into the total collapse of bank by the end of year 2019. The major factors that led to the fall of ABCB included disbursed loans of ₹ 1.5 bn to a leading stockbroker at the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) who used the money to purchase ABCB shares from the BSE and the National Stock Exchange (NSE). Trading volume of ABCB shares increased during July, 2015 and onwards to millions which was usually in the thousands after the entry of this leading stockbroker resulting into shooting up the price of ABCB's share continuously from ₹ 65 to ₹ 225 between October 2015 and June 2016 and thereafter started falling down regularly. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) later confirmed that ABCB's stock price increased because of price manipulation and the stockbroker had insider information. SEBI imposed a ban in March, 2017 on the promoters, the stockbroker and their associates for dealing in the ABCB shares till completion of the investigation of bank's capital market activities. RBI charged ABCB with several financial irregularities and lack of transparency in its banking operations. It had not followed SEBI guidelines, which capped a bank's direct exposure to capital markets at ten per cent of total advances of the bank. Since 2014, ABCB had given loans worth ₹ 17 bn to many stock brokers against shares as security. When the stock market witnessed a major fall in the aftermath of the securities scam loans given by ABCB against the security of shares turned into bad debts, taking a toll on the bank's financial position. ABCB's exposure to the capital market in the fiscal ending 2013-14 was around 24 per cent of total advances; which came down to 14 per cent by March 2016 and around five per cent for the fiscal ending March 2017. Though the exposure to capital markets had been brought down gradually by ABCB, the damage had already been done as most advances given till fiscal ending 2013-14 turned into NPAs due to the down trend of the stock market after the Securities Scam. In late 2012 and early 2013, ABCB gave loans of over ₹ 18 bn to corporate and jewellery trade related entities. ABCB for the fiscal 2017-18 had a total of 35 NPA accounts of corporates; 15 NPA accounts in trading; 15 NPA accounts in broking business and 55 NPA accounts relating to jewellery, food processing, textiles, petrochemicals, agriculture and media companies. ABCB reported a fall of 175% in its profits before tax (PBT) in the last quarter of fiscal 2017-18 because of provision for NPAs of ₹ 2.5 bn. RBI annual financial inspection (AFI) showed that the net worth had been totally eroded and capital adequacy ratio (CAR) had turned out negative. ABCB for the financial year 2017-18 recorded loss of ₹ 3.7 bn with gross NPAs at ₹ 19 bn accounting for 35% of the bank's total advances. High NPAs was a primary reason for ABCB's poor performance as it had lent indiscriminately without following RBI norms, to stockbrokers, diamond traders, exporters, corporates and others. In the wake of these financial irregularities, RBI placed ABCB under monthly monitoring and its operations relating to advances, premature withdrawal of deposits, declaration of dividend and capital market exposure were restricted. The statutory auditors of the bank were also asked to be changed. The central bank further advised ABCB to infuse fresh capital to prevent the net worth from remaining negative and restore its CAR to a minimum of nine per cent. The bank was advised to explore all possible options for infusion of capital through domestic sources or through merger with another bank. All these factors resulted in the imposition of moratorium by RBI and on July 24, 2018, the Government of India imposed a moratorium on the bank, on the grounds of 'wrong financial disclosures.' The moratorium was for three months from close of business on July 24, 2018 till October 23, 2018. RBI said the moratorium was imposed in public interest and to protect the interests of depositors. All operations of ABCB were frozen and it was ordered not to give loans without RBI permission. It was allowed only to make payments for day-to-day operations or for meeting obligations entered into before the order. On July 26, 2018, RBI announced that ABCB would be merged with the Northern Bank of Commerce (NBC). As per the scheme, NBC took over all the assets and liabilities of ABCB on its books. It acquired all branches, ATMs, employees and customers of ABCB at an estimated merger cost of ₹ 8 bn. All corporate accounts including salary accounts were transferred to NBC. The entire amount of paid-up equity capital of ABCB of ₹ 1 bn was adjusted towards its liabilities. There was no share swap between ABCB and NBC resulting into that the shareholders of ABCB did not get any shares of NBC. However, the interest of ABCB's depositors was protected, but its shareholders had lost their total investments in the bank overnight. In the backdrop of the facts and information given in the case, you are required to answer the following questions in the context of provisions contained under the RBI Act, 1934 and the Banking Regulation Act, 1949:- Evaluate critically the major factors/issues which led to collapse of ABC Bank despite having tremendous growth in the business in a short span and substantial increase in the share price. State also who were the most sufferers and whose interest were got protected because of the disaster of ABC Bank.

Answer & Explanation:

The ABC Bank incorporated on 30th October, 2004 was granted the Banking License in December, 2004 which offered array of the services as a banking company and was performing perfectly as is evident from the growth of total business of bank over a period of 5 years to ₹ 4 billion, compliance with all the regulatory norms of RBI and raising of its Tier-II capital. Tremendous growth is foreseen that by July 2015 the bank was having 450 branches, 875 ATMs, 5800 Employees, more than 7 million depositors with the deposit of ₹ 65 billion and the amount of loan disbursed to the extent of ₹ 52 billion. Price of the bank share was increasing continuously from ₹ 65 to ₹ 225 between October 2015 and June 2016 but thereafter started falling down. All these parameters indicate that the bank was working in perfect manner and there was no reason of its failure, but as indicated in the case the factors responsible for the disaster and failure of the bank are so many out of which important areas are as under: Negligible and poor corporate governance and supervisory control within the bank. Indulgence of the top management and promoters in advancing having collusion with the borrowers. Advances given to certain sectors beyond the permissible norms in discriminatory such as to stock brokers, jewelers, petro-chemicals, beverages companies and to others by showing standard assets and concealing the NPAs. Indiscriminate high interest rate given on the deposits. Trading in the shares of bank by the promoters through the leading the stock broker by giving huge advance and insider information which boosted the price of the bank's shares and thereafter fall down dramatically after reaping huge profits. Creation of provision relating to number of borrower accounts which were in the nature of NPAs resulting into huge loss to the bank in the financial year 2017-18 of an amount of ₹ 3.7 billion with gross NPA of ₹ 19 billion. The regulator RBI considering the bad shape of the bank announced its merger in July, 2018 with NBC but considering the huge losses, NPAs and liabilities the shareholders of the bank were not given any swap on their shares in the shares of NBC. Thus the shareholders who made the investment in the shares of bank for the paid-up capital of ₹ 1 billion were the prominent sufferers and sustained the total loss of the investment because of scandals and scam committed by the promoters by taking out their investment many fold in connivance with the stock broker. Poor public had put to loss which was substantial and their investment in the ABC Bank become 'Zero' in an overnight because of merger of the bank into NBC. Interest of the depositors though got protected by the RBI while merging the bank with NBC but it is very important to specify that the depositors might have also lost their money as they have invested in the bank for earning more interest on the deposits which was not being offered by any other banks. Had NBC not agreed at the time of merger to make the payment of principal amount of deposits/FDRs to the investors then more than 7 million depositors having deposit of ₹ 65 billion in the bank would have also be put to substantial loss but the interest of depositors got protected by the RBI.

Topics: Banking Operations and Failure

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic