Approval of the National Company Law Tribunal in relation to a scheme of arrangement involving merger is a conclusive proof that the merger has become successful and will yield desired results. Examine the statement.
CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Insolvency, Liquidation & Winding-up · PYQS · December 2022
Approval of the National Company Law Tribunal in relation to a scheme of arrangement involving merger is a conclusive proof that the merger has become successful and will yield desired results. Examine the statement.
Answer & Explanation:
Approval of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is a pre-requisite for schemes of Mergers. However, a Merger cannot be said to be completely successful only upon approval of the scheme of arrangement by NCLT. The factors which are required to measure the success of any merger are briefly discussed below: The earning performance of the merged company can be measured by return on total assets and return on net worth. It has been found that the probability of success or failure in economic benefits was very high among concentric mergers. Simple vertical and horizontal mergers were found successful whereas the performance of concentric mergers was in between these two extremes i.e. failure and success. Whether the merged company yields larger net profit than before, or a higher return on total funds employed or the merged company is able to sustain the increase in earnings. The capitalisation of the merged company determines its success or failure. Similarly, dividend rate and pay-outs also determines its success or failure. Whether merged company is creating a larger business organisation which survives and provides a basis for growth. Comparison of the performance of the merged company with the performance of similar sized company in the same business in respect of (i) sales, (ii) assets, (iii) net profit, (iv) earnings per share and (v) market price of share. In general, growth in profit, dividend pay outs, company's history, and increase in size provides base for future growth and are also the factors which help in determining the success or failure of a merged company. Fair market value is one of the valuation criteria for measuring the success of post-merger company. Fair market value is understood as the value in the hands between a willing buyer and willing seller, each having reasonable knowledge of all pertinent facts and neither being under pressure or compulsion to buy or sell. Such valuation is generally made in pre-merger cases. In valuing the whole enterprise, one must seek financial data of comparable companies in order to determine ratios that can be used to give an indication of the company position. The data is analyzed to estimate reasonable future earnings for the subject company. The following information must be made available and analyzed for post-merger valuation: All year-end balance sheets and income statements, preferably audited, for a period of five years and the remaining period up to the valuation date. All accounting control information relating to the inventory, sales, cost, and profit contribution by product line or other segment; property cost and depreciation records: executives and managerial compensation; and corporate structure. All records of patents, trademarks, contracts, or other agreements. A history of the company, including all subsidiaries. Analysis of these items provides data upon which forecasts of earnings, cash flow, etc. can be made. Gains to shareholders have so far been measured in terms of increase or decrease in share prices of the merged company. However, share prices are influenced by many factors other than the performance results of a company. Hence, this cannot be taken in isolation as a single factor to measure the success or failure of a merged company. In some mergers there is not only increase in the size of the merged or amalgamated company in regard to capital base and market segments but also in its sources and resources which enable it to optimize its end earnings. In addition to the above factors, a more specific consideration is required to be given to factors like improved debtors realisation, reduction in non-performing assets, improvement due to economies of large scale production and application of superior management in sources and resources available relating to finance, labour and materials. Accordingly, the statement is does not appear to be correct.
Topics: Mergers
Related Questions in this Topic
- What are the various stages involved in the merger of a company under the Companies Act, 2013?
- Mr. P is unable to pay his debt and wants to apply under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 for a fresh start proce...
- Comment on Professional Assistance to Company Liquidator as per provision of section 291 of the Companies Act, 2013. A c...
- A resolution plan shall provide for the measures, as may be necessary, for insolvency resolution of the corporate debtor...
- Explain the provision on actions to avoid acts detrimental to creditors as per provision of the Article 23 of the UNCITR...