Hari and Vishnu, employees in Kashinath Stone Crushing Factory, were engaged in loading a consignment to a truck. While doing the work, Vishnu sustained injuries due to the negligence of Hari. Vishnu claimed compensation
CS Professional · Labour Laws & Practice · PYQS · June 2023
Hari and Vishnu, employees in Kashinath Stone Crushing Factory, were engaged in loading a consignment to a truck. While doing the work, Vishnu sustained injuries due to the negligence of Hari. Vishnu claimed compensation from the management of the factory but the factory management told Vishnu to institute a suit against Hari only for the grant of relief. Decide the validity of the stand taken by the management.
Answer & Explanation:
The objective of Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is to protect workman and their dependents from being deprived of economic security on account of accidents sustained by them arising out of employment and in the course of employment. Section 3 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 provides that if personal injury is caused to an employee by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, his employer shall be liable to pay compensation in accordance with the provisions as prescribed under this Act. The expression "in the course of employment" suggests the period of employment and the place of work. In other words, the workman, at the time of accident must have been employed in the performance of his duties and the accident took place at or about the place where he was performing his duties. In a workplace, where the job is done by two or more employees then there is all the likelihood that one of the employees may sustain injury on account of the negligence of the other co- employee. In the given case, instead of instituting a case against Hari, it is the liability of the employer to pay compensation as per Employees Compensation Act, 1923.
Topics: Employees Compensation Act, 1923
Related Questions in this Topic
- Keerthan was employed by a publishing company as Marketing Executive. He was found guilty of fraud while in service and ...
- Suman, an employee of Prajwal Textiles was dismissed by the employer for misconduct. Suman filed a petition in the Labou...
- Vijaykanth and Amar Jha were in the employment as driver in a university. The university later found that operating the ...
- Vijaykanth and Amar Jha were in the employment as driver in a university. The university later found that operating the ...
- Put the following scenarios, in the category of : (i) 'Arising out of employment' and (ii) 'Arising in the course of emp...