Soman, had completed MBA in Finance and worked with a multinational company in its Treasury department. He was intrigued by the forex operations and wanted to pursue a career in that forex and treasury management. After
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2023
Soman, had completed MBA in Finance and worked with a multinational company in its Treasury department. He was intrigued by the forex operations and wanted to pursue a career in that forex and treasury management. After two years, he joined Fundex, a money changer firm with branches in all major cities in India. Having good experience and contacts, he wanted to start off something on his own and started a business as money changer firm, dealing in foreign currencies by acquiring, exchanging them on need basis, converting the foreign currency into Indian rupees. He handled all his operations, through physical exchange of currency, without getting involved in any banking transaction through his known sources. He did not maintain any records for his transactions and was sure that they would not be known to any regulatory agency. However, he was arrested and prosecuted by an Assistant Director of Enforcement Directorate, as all his transactions amounted to contravention of FEMA. Despite various searches and inquires, the quantum of amount involved in his dealings could not be ascertained as he had not maintained proper records. Under these circumstances, explain how the Adjudicating Authority can proceed in this matter.
Answer & Explanation:
As per section 13(1) of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (the Act) , if any person contravenes any provision of this Act, or contravenes any rule, regulation, notification, direction or order issued in exercise of the powers under this Act, or contravenes any condition subject to which an authorisation is issued by the Reserve Bank of India, he shall, upon adjudication, be liable to a penalty up to thrice the sum involved in such contravention where such amount is quantifiable, or up to two lakh rupees where the amount is not quantifiable, and where such contravention is a continuing one, further penalty which may extend to five thousand rupees for every day after the first day during which the contravention continues. Further, as per section 13(1A) of the Act if any person is found to have acquired any foreign exchange, foreign security or immovable property, situated outside India, of the aggregate value exceeding the threshold prescribed under the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 37A, he shall be liable to a penalty up to three times the sum involved in such contravention and confiscation of the value equivalent, situated in India, the foreign exchange, foreign security or immovable property. As per section 13(1B) , if the Adjudicating Authority, in a proceeding under sub-section (1A) deems fits, he may, after recording the reasons in writing, recommend for the initiation of prosecution and if the Director of Enforcement is satisfied, he may, after recording the reasons in writing, may direct prosecution by filing a Criminal Complaint against the guilty person by an officer not below the rank of Assistant Director. As per section 13(1C) , if any person is found to have acquired any foreign exchange, foreign security or immovable property, situated outside India, of the aggregate value exceeding the threshold prescribed under the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 37A, he shall be, in addition to the penalty imposed under sub-section (1A), punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine. As per section 13(2) of the Act , any Adjudicating Authority adjudging any contravention under sub-section (1), may, if he thinks fit in addition to any penalty which he may impose for such contravention direct that any currency, security or any other money or property in respect of which the contravention has taken place shall be confiscated to the Central Government and further direct that the foreign exchange holdings, if any, of the persons committing the contraventions or any part thereof, shall be brought back into India or shall be retained outside India in accordance with the directions made in this behalf. For the purposes of this sub-section, property in respect of which contravention has taken place, shall include: (a) deposits in a bank, where the said property is converted into such deposits; (b) Indian currency, where the said property is converted into that currency; and (c) any other property which has resulted out of the conversion of that property. The Adjudicating Authority may accordingly confiscate the foreign currency or the Indian currency seized or any other property as may have been resulted out of the said currency, besides levying the penalty prescribed under Section 13 as aforesaid.
Topics: Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)
Related Questions in this Topic
- Nexon Aerospace Ltd. made a payment for importing raw materials intended for manufacturing finished products. During thi...
- Mr. A, a resident of Kolkata was found to be involved in Hawala transactions and received notices in this regard from co...
- What are the penalties/punishments for the following ? Penalty for contravention of any provisions of Foreign Exchange M...
- An authorized officer under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 had reason to believe that Amar held foreign exchange ...
- OCPM Ltd has been compounded by RBI's order for the offences committed by the Company under FEMA on January 31, 2022. Th...