Ritu Housing Finance Company Limited initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against its corporate debtor Raj Infrastructure Limited under section 7 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The National Com
CS Professional · Corporate Restructuring, Insolvency, Liquidation & Winding-up · PYQS · December 2023
Ritu Housing Finance Company Limited initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against its corporate debtor Raj Infrastructure Limited under section 7 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The National Company Law Tribunal dismissed the application as not maintainable. The reason given was that winding up proceedings have already been initiated by the High Court. Quoting any decided case law confirm whether the application under section 7 of the Code is maintainable when winding up proceeding against the corporate debtor have already been initiated ?
Answer & Explanation:
In the decided case of Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited V/s Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Limited , the winding up proceedings against the corporate debtor had already been initiated by the Bombay High Court. Further, the fresh application for insolvency proceedings has been filed with NCLT Mumbai bench, which in turn had dismissed the application as the same was not maintainable in view of the fact that Hon'ble Bombay High Court already initiated the winding up proceedings. The corporate debtor appealed before National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and the tribunal examined the judgments and opined that once second stage i.e. liquidation (winding-up) proceedings has already been initiated, the question of reverting back to the first stage of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process or preparation of Resolution Plan does not arise. While arriving at its judgment, the NCLAT relied on the case of Forech India Pvt. Itd. vs. Edelweiss assets reconstruction Company Ltd. & Aanr. , wherein the tribunal observed that if a Corporate insolvency resolution has started or on failure, if liquidation proceeding has been initiated against the Corporate debtor, the question of entertaining another application under Section 7 or Section 9 against the same very Corporate debtor does not arise, as it is open to the 'Financial Creditor and the 'Operational Creditor' to make claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional/Official Liquidator. However, the matter went on appeal before the Hon'ble Supreme Court which declared by its judgment that the proceedings under Section 7 or 9 of the Code are independent proceedings and shall remain unaffected by the winding-up proceedings of the Companies Act. Thus, based on the above judgement given by Hon'ble Supreme Court, application filled by Ritu Housing Finance Company Limited under section 7 of the IBC code is maintainable.
Topics: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Related Questions in this Topic
- Prabhu Polyesters Ltd. is undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- Section 81 of the IBC 2016 provides for the imposition of an interim moratorium. The purpose of the interim moratorium i...
- What are the duties of resolution professional before initiation of pre-packaged insolvency resolution process ?
- A director of a company in CIRP had moved the Hon'ble NCLT, Mumbai Bench, seeking the right to participate in the meetin...
- "One of the main functions of the committee of creditors (constituted by the Interim Resolution Professional under secti...