Based on the telephonic instruction from the proper officer above the rank of Joint Commissioner, an officer has reached the principal place of business of Ravindra Gupta, a registered person under the GST law to conduct
CS Professional · Advanced Tax Laws · PYQS · December 2023
Based on the telephonic instruction from the proper officer above the rank of Joint Commissioner, an officer has reached the principal place of business of Ravindra Gupta, a registered person under the GST law to conduct search and seizure proceeding in pursuance of inspection. Ravindra Gupta has challenged the search and seizure proceeding initiated by the officer considering it as illegal. Based on the legal provision of the CGST Act, 2017, answer the following: (i) Whether the officer on the basis of telephonic instruction could initiate search and seizure proceeding? Whether the action of Ravindra Gupta is correct in considering search or seizure as illegal?
Answer & Explanation:
The officer on the basis of telephonic instruction could not initiate search and seizure proceeding because he must have an authorization in writing to initiate the search and seizure proceeding. Hence, the action of Ravindra Gupta is correct in considering it is illegal.
Topics: GST
Related Questions in this Topic
- Mr. Sunil has obtained a voluntary registration under the GST law in the State of Karnataka in January, 2024 but has not...
- With reference to the provision of section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding the provisional attachment of property, An...
- With reference to the provision of section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding the provisional attachment of property, An...
- With reference to the provision of section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding the provisional attachment of property, An...
- With reference to the provision of section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding the provisional attachment of property, An...