"Risk mitigation is the process by which an organization introduces specific measures to minimize or eliminate unacceptable risks associated with its operations". In view of this statement, explain different risk mitigat

CS Professional · Governance, Risk Management, Compliances and Ethics · PYQS · December 2023
"Risk mitigation is the process by which an organization introduces specific measures to minimize or eliminate unacceptable risks associated with its operations". In view of this statement, explain different risk mitigation measures undertaken by an organisation.

Answer & Explanation:

Risk mitigation is defined as taking steps to reduce adverse effects. Risk mitigation is the process by which an organization introduces specific measures to minimize or eliminate unacceptable risks associated with its operations. Risk mitigation measures can be directed towards reducing the severity of risk consequences, reducing the probability of the risk materializing, or reducing the organizations exposure to the risk. The risk mitigation step involves development of mitigation plans, designed to manage, eliminate, or reduce risk to an acceptable level. Once risks have been identified and assessed, the strategies to manage the risk fall into one or more of the following categories: (i) Transfer Risk : Normally in projects, assignments or multifaceted exercises, execution is fought with risks. Different agencies work together and these agencies take care to transfer risk in their areas to another agency which is better equipped to take care of a risk for a consideration. Here the concept of core competence curves in and whenever a particular agency, individual or a firm finds that it is dealing in an area where it does not have the core competence to deal with, it seeks the help of another agency which has the specific core competence to transfer its own risk. The risk may be in the form of loss of reputation or sub quality performance and this risk is taken care of through transfer. (ii) Tolerate Risk or Risk Retention : It is retention of the risk. It is accepting the loss when it occurs. True self-insurance falls in this category. Risk retention is a viable strategy for small risks where the cost of insuring against the risk would be greater over time than the total losses sustained. All risks that are not avoided, reduced or transferred are retained by default. This includes risks that are so large or catastrophic that they either cannot be insured against or the premiums would be infeasible. War is an example since most property and risks are not insured against war, so the loss attributed by war is retained by the insured. Also any amount of potential loss (risk) over the amount insured is retained risk. This may also be acceptable if the chance of a very large loss is small or if the cost to insure for greater coverage amount is so great it would hinder the goals of the organization too much. (iii) Reduce Risk : The purpose of risk treatment is not necessarily to obviate the risk, but more likely to contain the risk to an acceptable level. Internal controls are actions instigated from within the organization (although their effects may be felt outside of the organization) which are designed to contain risk to acceptable levels. Outsourcing could be an example of risk reduction if the outsourcer can demonstrate higher capability at managing or reducing risks. In this case companies outsource only some of their departmental needs. For example, a company may outsource only its software development, the manufacturing of hard goods, or customer support needs to another company, while handling the business management itself. This way, the company can concentrate more on business development without having to worry as much about the manufacturing process. Modern software development methodologies reduce risk by developing and delivering software incrementally. Earlier methodologies suffered from the fact that they only delivered software in the final phase of development; any problems encountered in initial phases meant costly rework and often jeopardized the whole project. (iv) Avoid Risk : This method results in complete elimination of exposure to loss due to a specific risk. It can be established by either avoiding to undertake the risky project or discontinuance of an activity to avoid risk. This means that no risky projects are undertaken. Alternatively, a project may be abandoned midway to mitigate the risk while handling a project. It is not performing an activity which could carry risk. An example would be not buying a property or business in order to not take on the liability that comes with it. Another would be not flying in order to not take the risk that the aeroplane were to be hijacked. Avoidance may seem the answer to all risks, but avoiding risks also means losing out on the potential gain that accepting (retaining) the risk may have allowed. Not entering a business to avoid the risk of loss also avoids the possibility of earning profits. (v) Combine Risk : When the business faces two or three risks, the overall risk is reduced by combination. This strategy is suitable mainly in the areas of financial risk. Different financial instruments say, shares and debentures are taken in a single portfolio to reduce the risk. (vi) Sharing Risk : Insurance is a method of sharing risk for a consideration. For example by paying insurance premium the company snares the risk with companies and the insurance companies themselves share their risk by doing re-insurance. (vii) Hedging Risk : Exposure of funds to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, prices etc., bring about financial risks resulting in losses or gain. The downside risk is often taken care.

Topics: Risk Management

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic