Bharath, the Managing Director of a company unilaterally announced the target in the Production Section that 9000 units of a particular type of Annunciator are to be manufactured in a month as against the normal producti
CS Professional · Labour Laws & Practice · PYQS · June 2024
Bharath, the Managing Director of a company unilaterally announced the target in the Production Section that 9000 units of a particular type of Annunciator are to be manufactured in a month as against the normal production of 5000 units. The workers of the company resisted the move and collectively decided to go on strike instantly. The Managing Director threatened to terminate them from services. Answer the following questions: (ii) Whether the decision to go on instant strike is legal? State the procedure.
Answer & Explanation:
Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 provides that no person employed in a public utility service shall go on strike in breach of contract - (a) without giving to the employer notice of strike, as hereinafter provided, within six weeks before striking; or (b) within fourteen days of giving such notice; or (c) before the expiry of the date of strike specified in any such notice as aforesaid; or (d) during the pendency of any conciliation proceedings before a conciliation officer and seven days after the conclusion of such proceedings. Further, Section 24 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 states that a strike shall be illegal if it is commenced or declared in contravention of the above-mentioned Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Therefore, the workers deciding to go on strike instantly without observing the procedure as prescribed under Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 will render the strike illegal.
Topics: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Related Questions in this Topic
- Vijaykanth and Amar Jha were in the employment as driver in a university. The university later found that operating the ...
- Vijaykanth and Amar Jha were in the employment as driver in a university. The university later found that operating the ...
- Kiran, the Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the workman), was appointed in 2011 as a helper in TVS Auto Ltd. (here...
- Kiran, the Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the workman), was appointed in 2011 as a helper in TVS Auto Ltd. (here...
- Kiran, the Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the workman), was appointed in 2011 as a helper in TVS Auto Ltd. (here...