Miss Fala Fatima is accused of certain offences and is being tried under the Criminal Procedure Code. Miss Tamanna is the complainant. Based on her complaint, the magistrate summoned Miss Fala Fatima to the court. On the

CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2024
Miss Fala Fatima is accused of certain offences and is being tried under the Criminal Procedure Code. Miss Tamanna is the complainant. Based on her complaint, the magistrate summoned Miss Fala Fatima to the court. On the day appointed for the appearance, she did not appear before the magistrate. Observing that Miss Fala Fatima did not obey the summons, the Magistrate acquitted her in the case. Applying provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, analyze and decide whether acquittance of Miss Fala Fatima by Magistrate is correct or not.

Answer & Explanation:

As per Section 256 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, (CrPC) if summon has been issued on a complaint, and on the day appointed for the appearance of accused, or any day subsequent thereto on which the hearing may be adjourned, the complainant does not appear, the Magistrate may take any one of the following steps: a. He may acquit the accused. b. He may adjourn the case to any other day. c. He may dispense with the personal attendance of the complainant and proceed with the case. In our case, Miss Fala Fatima, being the accused, did not appear as per summons, and the facts of the case do not mention about the failure on part of Miss Tamanna, i.e., the complainant and therefore the Magistrate has no power to acquit the accused in the given situation. Hence, the acquittance of Miss Fala Fatima is incorrect as per CrPC provisions.

Topics: Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)

Open in Interactive Practice Hub · Full Practice Hub · Chapter Weightage · More in this subject

Related Questions in this Topic