An investigation under section 210 of Companies Act, 2013 was undergoing for Forever Sisters Pvt. Ltd. Before commencement of the investigation, the company concluded its salary revision cycle in the month of May 2024 fo
CS Professional · Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies · PYQS · December 2024
An investigation under section 210 of Companies Act, 2013 was undergoing for Forever Sisters Pvt. Ltd. Before commencement of the investigation, the company concluded its salary revision cycle in the month of May 2024 for FY 2023-24 and paid arrears for April 2024 along with salaries for May 2024. Miss Richa was given a promotion with a special hike in salaries stating that she works with the Executive Director on various confidential projects. When investigation commenced in July 2024, confidential projects came under scanner and investigating agencies called up Executive Director along with Miss Richa for a formal high-level enquiry cum discussion to know more about the project in August 2024. On the very next day of this communication, the Executive Director called back the promotion of Miss Richa sensing that projects under investigation will take a back seat and there is no point spending such a huge amount on Miss Richa anymore. When this event of taking back promotion was challenged by investigation agency. Executive Director said that it is purely a financial decision depending upon viability of the project and he does not need any written approval from Tribunal to demote his employees. Analyze and decide the contention of Executive Director whether he is right or wrong.
Answer & Explanation:
Section 218 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) provides protection to employees during investigation. During the course of any investigation and during pendency of any proceeding against any person concerned in the conduct and management of the affairs of a company. Such company, other body corporate or person shall not discharge or suspend or punish any employee without approval of the Tribunal. This protection is available to employees during the investigation of the affairs or other matters of or relating to a company, other body corporate or persons or of the membership, ownership of shares or debentures. Following actions are not permitted without approval of the Tribunal: To discharge or suspend any employee; or To punish any employee, whether by dismissal, removal, reduction in rank or otherwise; or To change the term of employment to his disadvantages. Further Section 218(5) of the Act clarifies for the removal of doubts that the provisions of Section 218 shall have effect without prejudice to the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. In the given situation, investigation is undergoing and Miss Richa is demoted during its pendency without any approval from Tribunal, which falls under the category of "change the terms of employment to his disadvantage" and hence, contention of Executive Director is wrong.
Topics: Investigation
Related Questions in this Topic
- Differentiate between Punishment for False Statement and Punishment for False Evidence under the Companies Act, 2013.
- Mr. P who was a Managing Director of XYZ Ltd, was terminated from the position of Managing Director by virtue of an orde...
- Amit Sinha, commonly known as Sethji, has been accused of certain offenses under the SEBI Act, 1992. SEBI directed him t...
- State the punishment prescribed under Companies Act, 2013 for the following: (iv) Improper use of words "Limited" or "Pr...
- State the punishment prescribed under Companies Act, 2013 for the following: (iii) Punishment for wrongful withholding o...