Haritha and Poojitha entered into an agreement for the sale of an immovable property under construction in Haridwar. The agreement contained all relevant information such as details of the property, consideration and war

Answer 3(a) In Ramchandra v. Chinnubhai, AIR 1945 Mad.10 , it was held that if the material terms of an agreement are clear and specific, omission of certain details, which can be worked out by consent of the parties or in its absence, be settled by the court, the agreement would not be invalidated. As long as the essential ingredients of a valid contract as contemplated in the Contract Act, 1872 are fulfilled, the agreement can be enforced. The agreement between Haritha and Poojitha is not invalid merely because it lacks the timeline of payments or interest clause, as long as the consideration amount is fixed and agreed, the intention to transfer property is clear, and other material terms (like property details and clear title) are specified. However, it may be deficient and could lead to future disputes due to ambiguity in payment obligations. This can be settled by the court, or the parties should supplement the agreement with an addendum detailing payment timelines and interest terms.